7
$\begingroup$

Between the prime numbers $n=1327$ and $n+k = 1327+34 = 1361$ there are $k-1=33$ consecutive composite numbers.

If you double those bounding primes, getting $2\times1327=2654$ and $2\times1361=2722$, then between them you find $14$ primes, i.e. in the interval $[2654,2722]$ you have $2k+1=69$ numbers of which one out of every $69/14 = 4.92857\ldots$ is prime. With numbers that big you'd expect somewhat fewer than one in six or seven, if I'm not mistaken.

Herewith a wild guess: Is this larger interval compensating for the dearth of primes in that smaller interval, in the sense that for consecutive primes $n$ and $n+k$ with $k/n$ unusually big, you would typically find a more-than-expected number of primes between $2n$ and $2(n+k)$?

PS: For the record: $$2657, 2659, 2663, 2671, 2677, 2683, 2687, 2689, 2693, 2699, 2707, 2711, 2713, 2719$$

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

Let's check!

I took a list of the first 75 record gaps (all such gaps up to $4\cdot10^{18}$) and computed the surplus/deficit as follows:

Length: $2k$
Expected number of primes: $a=(2k)/\log(2n+k)$
Actual number of primes: $b=\pi(2n+2k)-\pi(2n)$
Surplus/deficit: $b-a$

Your wild guess is that the surplus/deficit is large. I don't see evidence for that below. In fact, the differences seem quite small and with no discernable trend in the sign that I could notice.

$n$: $b-a$
(surplus/deficit) 2: -0.242669869
3: -0.923593388
7: -0.767810050
23: -1.03701843
89: 0.938236581
113: 0.891106604
523: -0.165147951
887: 0.661116394
1129: 1.30931270
1327: 5.38864735
9551: -2.30265253
15683: -3.49840717
19609: 0.168474670
31397: -1.03313586
155921: -4.59627080
360653: -0.233870990
370261: 2.42614428
492113: 4.47793359
1349533: -2.93683604
1357201: -0.820822736
2010733: 0.535527956
4652353: 2.80524180
17051707: -2.75536459
20831323: 2.06172047
47326693: 3.04234128
122164747: -1.98847103
189695659: 5.30869089
191912783: 4.90602331
387096133: 1.57082568
436273009: -1.39602758
1294268491: 2.42481937
1453168141: 7.19891084
2300942549: 12.2356085
3842610773: 0.477843887
4302407359: -3.95002441
10726904659: 2.88454318
20678048297: 1.58315643
22367084959: 2.86821530
25056082087: -2.01669826
42652618343: 1.12998121
127976334671: 2.36764149
182226896239: 5.38990656
241160624143: 3.86869109
297501075799: 1.85341864
303371455241: 1.14229752
304599508537: 5.11592277
416608695821: -2.59760017
461690510011: 11.3811436
614487453523: -0.365925500
738832927927: 2.45814519
1346294310749: -5.66869373
1408695493609: -9.02301866
1968188556461: -5.51540625
2614941710599: -7.52729176
7177162611713: -14.4956850
13829048559701: -9.26676981
19581334192423: -6.94764939
42842283925351: -1.50117974
90874329411493: -4.97415314
171231342420521: -9.16658637
218209405436543: 8.24680393
1189459969825483: -7.74348578
1686994940955803: 3.31473651
1693182318746371: 5.68644133
43841547845541059: 2.30151452
55350776431903243: -0.0514077826
80873624627234849: -2.57758027
203986478517455989: -4.36994750
218034721194214273: 0.547260030
305405826521087869: 5.88086588
352521223451364323: 11.3724657
401429925999153707: -6.78220238
418032645936712127: -4.39610157
804212830686677669: -5.79477642
1425172824437699411: -18.4686767

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.