I am trying to solve the following problem: Let $$A^2=\begin{bmatrix} -2 & 2 & -4 \\ 2& 1 & -2\\ 4 &-6 & 6 \end{bmatrix}$$ Consider the trace of the matrix $A$ is $-1$. Then what is the determinant of the matrix $A$?

I have tried to solve the problem as follows:

Let $\lambda_1,\lambda_2,\lambda_3$ be the eigenvalues of the matrix $A$.

Then determinant is $\lambda_1\lambda_2\lambda_3$, but $\lambda_1^2\lambda_2^2\lambda_3^2=36 \implies \lambda_1\lambda_2\lambda_3=\pm 6.$

After that I am stuck.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You also know that $\lambda_1+\lambda_2+\lambda_3=-1$ since the sum of the eigenvalues equals the trace. $\endgroup$ Jun 9, 2016 at 17:24
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The sum of their squares is equal to trace($A^2$) which is 5. $\endgroup$
    – Aravind
    Jun 9, 2016 at 17:33
  • $\begingroup$ Yeah but this does not help a lot. $\endgroup$
    – user346772
    Jun 9, 2016 at 17:46

2 Answers 2


Finding the eigenvalues of $A^2$ numerically gives the real eigenvalue as around 6.9 and one complex eigenvalue around 0.95 + 1.25i. Taking square roots, the absolute values of the real eigenvalue of $A$ is around 2.6 and the real part of the complex eigenvalues has absolute value around 0.8. Since the trace is -1, this means the real eigenvalue of $A$ is negative; hence $det(A)=-6$.


Set $A^2 = B$. By writing and analyzing the characteristic polynomial of $B$, you can see that it has only one real root $\mu_1 > 0$ and hence two complex non-real conjugate roots $\mu_2, \mu_3 = \overline{\mu}_2$. Assuming $A$ is a real matrix with (possibly complex) eigenvalues $\lambda_i$, we can arrange the eigenvalues so that $\lambda_i^2 = \mu_i$. Since $\mu_2, \mu_3$ are not real, $\lambda_2, \lambda_3$ will also be not real and since $A$ is real, we will have $\lambda_1 \in \mathbb{R}$ and $\lambda_3 = \overline{\lambda}_2$. Now,

$$ \det(A) = \lambda_1 \lambda_2 \lambda_3 = \lambda_1 \lambda_2 \overline{\lambda}_2 = \lambda_1 |\lambda_2|^2 = \pm 6 $$

and so we will know the determinant if we will know the sign of $\lambda_1$.

Beyond this point, I'm not sure how we can continue without using the formula for the roots of a cubic or solving numerically. If we solve numerically, we see that $$\mu_1 \approx 6.91, \,\, \mu_2 \approx -0.95 + 2.07i, \,\, \mu_3 \approx -0.95 - 2.07i$$ (up to reordering $\mu_2,\mu_3$) which means we have two options for $(\lambda_2, \lambda_3)$ (up to reordering):

$$ \lambda_2 \approx 0.81 + 1.27i, \,\, \lambda_3 \approx 0.81 - 1.27i, \\ \lambda_2 \approx -0.81 - 1.27i, \,\, \lambda_3 \approx -0.81 + 1.27i $$

and $\lambda_1 \approx \pm 2.62$. In any case, the relation

$$ -1 = \lambda_1 + \lambda_2 + \lambda_3 = \lambda_1 + 2 \operatorname{Re}(\lambda_2) \approx \lambda_1 \pm 1.62 $$

implies that $\lambda_1$ must be negative and so $\det(A) = -6$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.