2
$\begingroup$

This question already has an answer here:

I have seen such proofs many times and was unable to prove where it was wrong (not a math person-my bad).
For example the following proof for $\frac{0}{0} = 2$ looks like it is proven correctly - but somehow I feel that it cannot be right.

enter image description here.

This could be pun but I want to know where it is wrong

$\endgroup$

marked as duplicate by Matthew Towers, gebruiker, Daniel W. Farlow, Chill2Macht, Shailesh Jun 7 '16 at 0:00

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ It is wrong when in the beginning ou assume that $\frac 00$ is defined. $\endgroup$ – Hagen von Eitzen Jun 6 '16 at 18:10
  • $\begingroup$ It involves canceling a $(10-10)$ in middle, which is forbidden, as $(10-10)=0$. $\endgroup$ – Brian Cheung Jun 6 '16 at 18:11
  • $\begingroup$ It is especially wrong when you divide the top and bottom of the fraction by $0$ $\endgroup$ – Omnomnomnom Jun 6 '16 at 18:11
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Any argument that uses the expression $\frac{0}{0}$ is wrong. Sometimes a wrong argument happens to yield a correct answer. $\endgroup$ – André Nicolas Jun 6 '16 at 18:11
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ $0 \cdot 4 = 0 \cdot 1 \Rightarrow 4 =1 $ by cancelling out the zeros. Which is clearly nonsense. The laws of maths specifically disallow dividing by zero. So no this is not a proof. There are lots of false proofs which rely on hiding a division by zero. $\endgroup$ – Warren Hill Jun 6 '16 at 18:18
3
$\begingroup$

What is wrong is that you can't consider $\frac 00$ in the first place. So everything you will do after that will just be false, because it's from something which is false.

You can show the same way that $\frac 00=3$, and this is nonsense.

Plus, you can't not simplify by $10-10$, because you can never simplify by $0$.

$\endgroup$
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ If you start from something meaningless, you might infer other things that are meaningless, or you might infer some things are are meaningful. The meaningful statements might be true, but they could be false. $\endgroup$ – hardmath Jun 6 '16 at 18:14
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I couldn't agree more ! $\endgroup$ – E. Joseph Jun 6 '16 at 18:18
4
$\begingroup$

The error starts right at the beginning, it is always wrong to divide by zero. Any conclusion can be followed from wrong assumptions.

$\endgroup$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.