3
$\begingroup$

Suppose $\mathsf C$ is a complete extensive category.

I managed to prove that a bundle $\alpha$ is a fiber bundle with fiber $F$ if there exists an associated cover $p:\coprod_iU_i\rightarrow B$ such that $p^\ast\alpha$ is a trivial fiber bundle with fiber $F$. For this, I used the fact extensive categories with products are distributive.

$$\require{AMScd} \begin{CD} U_i\times F @>>> A\\ @VVV @VV{\alpha}V\\ U_i @>>> B \end{CD}\forall i\iff\require{AMScd} \begin{CD} \coprod_iU_i\times F @>>> A\\ @V{p^\ast\alpha}VV @VV{\alpha}V\\ \coprod_iU_i @>>{p}> B \end{CD}$$

Now, I read that:

It is not really important to require all $F_b$ above to be homeomorphic to each other. Without that requirement there is still a reasonable description of locally trivial bundles, namely as those which split over some $(E,p)$, where $p$ is a surjective local homeomorphism, with trivial bundles replaced by their coproducts in the arrow category of $\mathsf{Top}$.

But I don't understand what this means. Suppose we restrict only to $p:\coprod _i U_i\rightarrow B$ the associated cover of a covering family. Is it saying the right square is a pullback iff all left ones are?

$$\require{AMScd} \begin{CD} U_i\times F_i @>>> A\\ @VVV @VV{\alpha}V\\ U_i @>>> B \end{CD}\forall i\iff\require{AMScd} \begin{CD} \coprod_iU_i\times F_i @>>> A\\ @V{p^\ast\alpha}VV @VV{\alpha}V\\ \coprod_iU_i @>>{p}> B \end{CD}$$

What do I do here?

Added. I have answered my original question below, but am clueless about the case of $p:E\rightarrow B$ a general étale surjection.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

The for associated covers proof is exactly the same, and rests on the following characterization of universal coproducts.

Let $\mathsf{C}$ be a category with pullbacks and coproducts. TFAE.

  • Coproducts are universal.
  • The square on the right is a pullback if the square on the left is a pullback for each $i$.$$\require{AMScd} \begin{CD} P_i @>>> X_i\\ @VVV @VVV\\ A @>>> B \end{CD}\forall i\implies\require{AMScd} \begin{CD} \coprod_iP_i @>>> \coprod_iX_i\\ @VVV @VVV\\ A @>>> B \end{CD}$$
  • The square on the right is a pullback if and only if the square on the left is a pullback for each $i$.$$\require{AMScd} \begin{CD} P_i @>>> X_i\\ @VVV @VVV\\ A @>>> B \end{CD}\forall i\iff\require{AMScd} \begin{CD} \coprod_iP_i @>>> \coprod_iX_i\\ @VVV @VVV\\ A @>>> B \end{CD}$$

I don't know what to do about the case of general étale surjections.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.