3
$\begingroup$

I read "Algebra: Chapter 0" by P.Aluffi. I encountered a topic where it says you can divide any polynomial in $R[x]$($R$ is any ring) by a monic polynomial(that is, a polynomial of the form $x^d + \sum\limits_{i=0}^{d-1} a_i x^{i}$).

It says if $g(x)$ is any polynomial and $f(x)$ is a monic polynomial. Then $\exists \ \ \ q(x), r(x) \in R[x], deg \ r(x) < deg \ f(x): g(x) = f(x)q(x) + r(x).$

I have two questions regarding this:

1) Why $f(x)$ needs to be monic?

2) How can we prove it? The book talk about induction and that if $deg \ g(x) = n > d = deg \ f(x)$, then $\forall a \in R$ we have $ax^n = ax^{n-d}f(x) + h(x)$ for some $h(x): deg \ h(x) < n$. It's true, but how do I take it from here?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ $1)$ - How would you divide $X$ by $2X$ in $\mathbb{Z}[X]$? $\endgroup$ – Aloizio Macedo Jun 3 '16 at 20:21
  • $\begingroup$ @ Aloizio I see, there is no way. $\endgroup$ – Jxt921 Jun 3 '16 at 20:25
  • $\begingroup$ deg $h(x)$ should be less than $d$ instead of $n$ $\endgroup$ – PleaseHelp Oct 9 '16 at 15:51
4
$\begingroup$

The reason $f$ has to be monic is that you can always divide by $1$, but not for other elements. Actually, the leading coefficient of $f$ can be any unit.

The proof is by induction on the degree of $g$; if $g$ is the zero polynomial, there is nothing to prove. If $g$ has degree zero and $f(x)=1$, write $g(x)=f(x)g(x)+0$; if $f$ has degree $>0$, $g(x)=f(x)\cdot 0+g(x)$.

Suppose $g$ has degree $n$ and that the statement holds for polynomials of degree $k<n$. Let's assume $\deg f=m$.

If $n<m$, we are done: $g(x)=f(x)\cdot 0+g(x)$. Otherwise, let $a_n$ be the leading coefficient of $g(x)$ and consider $$ g_1(x)=g(x)-a_nx^{n-m}f(x) $$ By construction, $\deg g_1<n$, so $g_1(x)=f(x)q_1(x)+r(x)$, with $\deg r<m$, by the induction hypothesis. Therefore $$ g(x)=g_1(x)+a_nx^{n-m}f(x)=f(x)(a_nx^{n-m}+q_1(x))+r(x) $$ and we are finished.

If the leading coefficient of $f(x)$ is a unit $u$, then $u^{-1}f(x)$ is monic, so $$ g(x)=u^{-1}f(x)q_0(x)+r(x) $$ by the previous result and now $q(x)=u^{-1}q_0(x)$ solves the problem.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Good answer! However, I have a question regarding the last part. $u^{-1}f(x)$ is indeed monic, but what if $R$ is not commutative? What if $u^{-1}f(x)q_0(x) \neq f(x)u^{-1}q_0(x)$. Should we use $f(x)u^{-1}$ instead? So do we only need the leading coefficient of $f(x)$ to be left-unit? $\endgroup$ – Jxt921 Jun 5 '16 at 11:58
  • $\begingroup$ @Jxt921 In all this discussion I assumed the ring to be commutative. If not, that's the solution. $\endgroup$ – egreg Jun 5 '16 at 12:19
  • $\begingroup$ @egreg when $f(x)=1 , g(x) = f(x)g(x)+0$ $\endgroup$ – PleaseHelp Oct 9 '16 at 16:33
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @atulgangwar Good shot! $\endgroup$ – egreg Oct 9 '16 at 18:02
0
$\begingroup$

For polynomials over any commutative coefficient ring, the high-school polynomial long division algorithm works to divide with remainder by any monic polynomial, i.e any polynomial $\rm\:f\:$ whose leading coefficient $\rm\:c =1\:$ (or a unit), since $\rm\:f\:$ monic implies that the leading term of $\rm\:f\:$ divides all higher degree monomials $\rm\:x^k,\ k\ge n = deg\ f,\:$ so the high-school division algorithm works to kill all higher degree terms in the dividend, leaving a remainder of degree $\rm < n = deg\ f.$

The division algorithm generally fails if $\rm\:f\:$ is not monic, e.g. $\rm\: x = 2x\:q + r\:$ has no solution for $\rm\:r\in \mathbb Z,\ q\in \mathbb Z[x],\:$ since evaluating at $\rm\:x=0\:$ $\Rightarrow$ $\rm\:r=0,\:$ evaluating at $\rm\:x=1\:$ $\Rightarrow$ $\:2\:|\:1\:$ in $\mathbb Z,\,$ contradiction. Notice that the same proof works in any coefficient ring $\rm\:R\:$ in which $2$ is not a unit (invertible). Conversely, if $2$ is a unit in $\rm\:R,$ say $\rm\:2u = 1\:$ for $\rm\:u\in R,\:$ then division is possible: $\rm\: x = 2x\cdot u + 0.$

However, we can generalize the division algorithm to the non-monic case as follows.

Theorem (nonmonic Polynomial Division Algorithm) $\ $ Let $\,0\neq F,G\in A[x]\,$ be polynomials over a commutative ring $A,$ with $\,a\,$ = lead coef of $\,F,\,$ and $\, i \ge \max\{0,\,1+\deg G-\deg F\}.\,$ Then
$\qquad\qquad \phantom{1^{1^{1^{1^{1^{1}}}}}}a^{i} G\, =\, Q F + R\ \ {\rm for\ some}\ \ Q,R\in A[x],\ \deg R < \deg F$

Proof $\ $ Hint: use induction on $\,\deg G.\,$ See this answer for a full proof.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.