0
$\begingroup$

$\ell_p = \{ x = (x_n) : x_n \in \mathbb C \ \ \forall \ \ n \geq 1 \ \ \text{and} \ \ (\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} |x_n|^p)^{\frac{1}{p}} < \infty \}$ and let $e_n \in \ell_p$ be the sequence whose $n$-th element is 1 and all other elements are zero. Then the set $S=\{ e_n : n \in \mathbb N \}$. Then which of the following are true ?

  • $S$ is closed

  • $S$ is bounded

  • $S$ is compact

  • $S$ contains a convergent subsequence

we know that if any $e_i , e_j$, then $||e_i - ej|| = 2^{\frac{1}{p}}$, if $i \neq j \in \ell_p$ , so $S$ contains no convergent subsequence and $S$ is a bounded sequence.

we know that if any closed and bounded subset of a normed linear space is compact then this space is finite dimmensional, but $\ell_p$ is infinite dimensional, So $S$ is not closed and compact. we know that every normed linear space is a metric space which is Hausdorff and every compact space in a Hausdorff is closed. If $S$ is compact then $S$ is closed, we got a contradiction. So $S$ cannot be compact.

I am unable how to check whether $S$ is closed or not. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Your proof that $S$ is not compact is completely wrong. With the same reasoning, you prove that $\ell^p$ contains no compact subsets, which is obviously false. $\endgroup$ – Giuseppe Negro Jun 1 '16 at 14:06
  • $\begingroup$ I does not mean that $\ell_p$ has no compact subspace. I have proved that $S$ is cot compact. $\endgroup$ – Struggler Jun 1 '16 at 17:19
  • $\begingroup$ @ Henno : Thanks for editing $\endgroup$ – Struggler Jun 1 '16 at 17:21
1
$\begingroup$

Suppose $x\in\overline{S}$ (the closure of $S$). Then there exists $\{x_n\}\subset S$ such that $x_n\to x$. Because of your remark: $\|e_i - ej\| = 2^{\frac{1}{p}}$, the sequence can only converge if it is definitively constant, which means $x\in S$. Therefore $\overline{S}=S$, that is $S$ is closed.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Note that this implies it is not compact (because then every sequence contains a convergent subsequence which is not the case). $\endgroup$ – Henno Brandsma Jun 1 '16 at 16:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.