Conjecture $\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{\ln(n+2)}{n\,(n+1)}\,\stackrel{\color{gray}?}=\,{\large\int}_0^1\frac{x\,(\ln x-1)}{\ln(1-x)}\,dx$ Numerical calculations suggest that
$$\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{\ln(n+2)}{n\,(n+1)}\,\stackrel{\color{gray}?}=\,\int_0^1\frac{x\,(\ln x-1)}{\ln(1-x)}\,dx=1.553767373413083673460727...$$
How can we prove it? Is there a closed form expression for this value?
 A: By Frullani's theorem
$$ \log(n+2)=\int_{0}^{+\infty}\frac{1-e^{-(n+1)x}}{xe^x}\,dx \tag{1}$$
hence by multiplying both sides by $\frac{1}{n(n+1)}$ and summing over $n\geq 1$ we get:
$$ \sum_{n\geq 1}\frac{\log(n+2)}{n(n+1)}=\int_{0}^{+\infty}\frac{(1-e^{-x})\left(1-\log(1-e^{-x})\right)}{xe^x}\,dx\tag{2} $$
then, by substituting $x=-\log(u)$:
$$ \sum_{n\geq 1}\frac{\log(n+2)}{n(n+1)}=\int_{0}^{1}\frac{(u-1)\left(1-\log(1-u)\right)}{\log(u)}\,du\tag{3} $$
and the claim follows by substituting $v=(1-u)$. 

I do not think there is a nice closed form but in terms of a derivative of some special zeta function, due to $\log(n+2) = \left.\frac{d}{d\alpha}(n+2)^{\alpha}\right|_{\alpha=0^+}$, but for sure
$$ \int_{0}^{1}\frac{-x}{\log(1-x)}\,dx = \int_{0}^{1}\frac{x-1}{\log x}\,dx = \log 2$$
and the Taylor series of $\frac{x}{\log(1-x)}$ depends on Gregory coefficients.
A: Additionnally, by applying Theorem $2$ (here), one obtains a closed form in terms of the poly-Stieltjes constants.
Proposition. We have

$$
\begin{align}
\int_0^1\frac{x\,(\ln x-1)}{\ln(1-x)}\,dx= \ln 2+\gamma_1(2,0)-\gamma_1(1,0)
\tag1
\\\\\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{\ln(n+2)}{n\,(n+1)}=\ln 2+\gamma_1(2,0)-\gamma_1(1,0)
\tag2
\end{align}$$ 

where 

$$
\gamma_1(a,b) = \lim_{N\to+\infty}\left(\sum_{n=1}^N \frac{\log (n+a)}{n+b}-\frac{\log^2 \!N}2\right).
$$

A: $\newcommand{\angles}[1]{\left\langle\, #1 \,\right\rangle}
 \newcommand{\braces}[1]{\left\lbrace\, #1 \,\right\rbrace}
 \newcommand{\bracks}[1]{\left\lbrack\, #1 \,\right\rbrack}
 \newcommand{\dd}{\mathrm{d}}
 \newcommand{\ds}[1]{\displaystyle{#1}}
 \newcommand{\expo}[1]{\,\mathrm{e}^{#1}\,}
 \newcommand{\half}{{1 \over 2}}
 \newcommand{\ic}{\mathrm{i}}
 \newcommand{\iff}{\Leftrightarrow}
 \newcommand{\imp}{\Longrightarrow}
 \newcommand{\ol}[1]{\overline{#1}}
 \newcommand{\pars}[1]{\left(\, #1 \,\right)}
 \newcommand{\partiald}[3][]{\frac{\partial^{#1} #2}{\partial #3^{#1}}}
 \newcommand{\root}[2][]{\,\sqrt[#1]{\, #2 \,}\,}
 \newcommand{\totald}[3][]{\frac{\mathrm{d}^{#1} #2}{\mathrm{d} #3^{#1}}}
 \newcommand{\verts}[1]{\left\vert\, #1 \,\right\vert}$
Another possible integral representation:
\begin{align}
\color{#f00}{\sum_{n = 1}^{\infty}{\ln\pars{n + 2} \over n\pars{n + 1}}} & =
\sum_{n = 1}^{\infty}{1 \over n\pars{n + 1}}\
\overbrace{\bracks{\pars{n + 1}\int_{0}^{1}{\dd t \over 1 + \pars{n + 1}t}}}
^{\ds{\ln\pars{n + 2}}}
\\[3mm] & =
\int_{0}^{1}
\sum_{n = 0}^{\infty}{1 \over \pars{n + 2 + 1/t}\pars{n + 1}}\,{\dd t \over t} =
\int_{0}^{1}
{\Psi\pars{2 + 1/t} - \Psi\pars{1} \over 1 + 1/t}\,{\dd t \over t}
\\[3mm] & \stackrel{t\ \to 1/t}{=}\
\color{#f00}{\int_{1}^{\infty}
{\Psi\pars{2 + t} - \Psi\pars{1} \over t + 1}\,{\dd t \over t} =
\gamma\ln\pars{2} + \int_{1}^{\infty}
{\Psi\pars{2 + t} \over t\pars{t + 1}}\,\dd t}
\end{align}
