1
$\begingroup$

Let $\mathfrak{g}$ finite dimentional semisimple Lie algebra and $\sigma$ the usual chevalley anti-involution that fixes the Cartan subalgebra $\mathfrak{h}$ sends the weight space $\mathfrak{g}_\alpha$ in $\mathfrak{g}_{-\alpha}$ for $\alpha \in \mathfrak{h}^*$ (better, if $x_1 \dots x_n,h_1 \dots h_l,y_1\dots y_n$ is a chevalley basis, then there exists a isomophism $\sigma$ of $\mathfrak{g}$, as a vector space, that sends $x_i$ in $y_i$ for all $i$ and fixes the $h_i$'s). I would want to know if $\sigma$ lifts to an antihomorphism of the universal enveloping algebra, i.e. if there exists and application $\tilde \sigma \colon \mathcal{U}(\mathfrak{g}) \to \mathcal{U}(\mathfrak{g})$ such that $\tilde \sigma (xy)=\tilde \sigma(y) \tilde \sigma(x)$. Seems quite natural to me, but unfortunately I loose myself in technical details.

Motivation: I have to prove that the Shapovalov form is symmetric, I am following "Lie algebras with triangular decompositions" of Moody-Pianzola and seems that they used the fact above for proving it.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

I solved my problem simply defining the universal property for anti-homomorphims. Let $A$ algebra, $\mathfrak{g}$ Lie algebra and $\sigma \colon \mathfrak{g} \to A$ anti-homomorphism of Lie algebras. Then this application

\begin{gather} \sigma_n \colon \mathfrak{g} \times \ldots \times \mathfrak{g} \to A \\ (x_1 \dots x_n) \mapsto \sigma(x_n) \ldots \sigma(x_1) \end{gather} is multilinear, so we can define \begin{gather} \sigma_n \colon \mathfrak{g}^{\otimes n} \to A \\ x_1\otimes \dots \otimes x_n \mapsto \sigma(x_n) \ldots \sigma(x_1) \end{gather} Now glue together all the $\sigma_n$'s on the tensor algebra to obtain a map \begin{gather} \tilde\sigma \colon T:= \bigoplus_{n \in \mathbb{N}}\mathfrak{g}^{\otimes n} \to A \end{gather} Note that by contruction $\tilde \sigma(x\otimes y)=\tilde \sigma(y)\tilde \sigma(x)$ (indeed this can be directly checked on $x=x_1 \otimes \dots \otimes x_n$ and $y=y_1 \otimes \dots \otimes y_m$). Here comes the surprising part:

\begin{multline} \tilde \sigma([x,y])=\sigma([x,y])=[\sigma (y),\sigma (x)]=\\=\sigma (y) \sigma (x)- \sigma (x)\sigma (y)=\tilde \sigma (y)\tilde \sigma (x)-\tilde \sigma (x)\tilde \sigma (y)=\\ =\tilde \sigma(x\otimes y) -\tilde \sigma(y\otimes x)=\tilde \sigma(x\otimes y-y\otimes x). \end{multline} All the elements of the form $[x,y]-(x\otimes y-y\otimes x)$ are in the kernel and then we can define

\begin{gather} \tau \colon \mathcal{U}(\mathfrak{g}) \to A \end{gather} Note that for $x,y \in \mathcal{U}(\mathfrak{g})$ we have $\tau(xy)=\tau(y)\tau(x)$. This is the universal property of the universal enveloping algebra with respect to the anti-homomorphisms.

Now consider $\sigma$ the Chevalley anti-homomorphism and compose it with the inclusion $i\colon\mathfrak{g} \to \mathcal{U}(\mathfrak{g})$, $i\tilde \sigma\colon\mathfrak{g} \to \mathcal{U}(\mathfrak{g})$, note that this last map is an anti-homomorphism. By the universal property described above $i\tilde \sigma $ lifts to a map $\tau\colon \mathcal{U}(\mathfrak{g}) \to\mathcal{U}(\mathfrak{g})$ such that by contruction $\tau(xy)=\tau(y)\tau(x)$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.