2
$\begingroup$

The below Golden Ratio Construction results in a ratio of PHI (1.6180...) between the blue line and red line, as found in Geogebra. This seems like a simple construction of the golden ratio, yet so far I have not found anything similar. If you know of a similar golden ratio construction, please do share! Thanks!

This Golden Ratio construction is made in the following manner:

  1. Draw two adjacent squares Square1 and Square2.
  2. Draw a circle with radii equal to the side of the Square, placed at the corner of Square2 as drawn below.
  3. A line passing through the two opposing corners of the two adjacent squares will then define the golden cut in conjunction with the circle, as shown below. The ratio of segment t to segment s, (or the blue segment to the red segment), is the golden ratio PHI.

New Golden Ratio Construction with Two Adjacent Squares and Circle.

Has anyone come across anything the same or similar?

And of course trigonometric and geometric proofs of the golden ratio construction are always welcome!

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I haven't seen such a construction before, but just a quick analysis - normalizing the side length of the squares to 1, we have the diagonal of the rectangle with length $\sqrt{1^2+2^2}=\sqrt{5}$, giving the red line length $\sqrt{5}-1$. The diameter of the circle (i.e. the blue line) has length $2$, so the ratio of the blue line to red line is $\frac{2}{\sqrt{5}-1}=\frac{2\left(\sqrt{5}+1\right)}{4}=\frac{\sqrt{5}+1}{2}$ as desired. $\endgroup$ – Peter Woolfitt May 23 '16 at 21:31
  • $\begingroup$ @Peter Woolfitt That could be an answer to the follow on question. $\endgroup$ – user301988 May 24 '16 at 0:46
  • $\begingroup$ It is very similar to one of the steps for the usual construction of the regular pentagon (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentagon). $\endgroup$ – Jack D'Aurizio May 24 '16 at 2:40
  • $\begingroup$ which step @JackD'Aurizio? could you please be more specific and perhaps even provide a figure or link to a figure or drawing? thanks! :) $\endgroup$ – Astrophysics Math May 24 '16 at 2:41
  • $\begingroup$ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Richmond_pentagon_1.PNG $\endgroup$ – Jack D'Aurizio May 24 '16 at 2:42
1
$\begingroup$

A similar construction is shown at http://www.goldennumber.net/circles/ in 2006. It just happens to have circles drawn on either side of the center circle, which are not important to the golden ratio point that is created.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ i count three circles used there. i only use two circles. or in this case a circle and two squares. :) $\endgroup$ – Astrophysics Math May 27 '16 at 9:08
0
$\begingroup$

Your construction in this question occurs as a subobject in the construction here. Your particular result does not appear explicitly there, but is produced by projecting Molokach's points $A$, $B$, and $H$ through an unconstructed point interior to the triangle $ACH$.

Your duplicate question, New, extremely simple golden ratio construction with two identical circles and line. Is there any prior art?, using the two circles construction is equivalent to the left pair of the three circles construction here.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks! In both cases it seems my constructs are simpler--fewer circles and less complicated objects. :) $\endgroup$ – Astrophysics Math May 24 '16 at 5:43
  • $\begingroup$ thanks again @EricTowers for your feedback confirming that prior art doesn't exist. have you ever seen any prior art for the new golden ratio construct i just posted here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1798843/… ? :) $\endgroup$ – Astrophysics Math May 25 '16 at 3:48

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.