Let $B(t)$ be the standard Brownian motion, $\mu(t,x)$ and $\sigma(t,x)$ are continuous functions, and $$dr(t) = \mu(t,r(t))dt+\sigma(t,r(t))dB(t).$$ Is there a pair $(\mu,\sigma)$ such that $$\infty>\mathbf E \Big[\Big(\int_0^t r(s)ds\Big)^2\Big]> ct, \quad \forall t\in(0,T]$$ for some positive constants $c$ and $T$?

1) Consider $\mu(t,x)=\mu(t)$ and $\sigma(t,x)=\sigma(t)$.

Assume these functions are bounded on $t\in[0,T_0]$ for some positive $T_0$, the inequality does not hold. The derivation is as follows. $$I :=\int_0^t r(s)ds=r(0)t+\int_0^t\mu(s)(t-s)ds+\int_0^t \sigma(s)(t-s)dB(s),$$ and \begin{align} \mathbf E[I^2] &= \Big(r(0)t+\int_0^t\mu(s)(t-s)ds\Big)^2+\int_0^t \sigma(s)^2(t-s)^2ds \\ &<\Big(r(0)t+\frac{C_1}2t^2\Big)^2+\frac{C_2^2}{3}t^3 \\ &=o(t), \quad t\to 0^+ \end{align} for some positive $C_1, C_2$ as we take the bounds of $\mu(t)$ and $\sigma(t)$. That violates the required inequality.

So we have to consider $\mu(t)$ and $\sigma(t)$ unbounded at $t=0^+$. $\sigma(t)=t^{-a}$, for some $1>a>0$, does not work though.

2) What about general $\mu(t,x)$ and $\sigma(t,x)$?

  • $\begingroup$ Well, sure, just take $\mu := 0$ and $\sigma := 1$. $\endgroup$ – saz May 18 '16 at 15:12
  • $\begingroup$ @saz: I have tried this case first and I got a high order $t$, so I rejected it. The expectation on the left hand side $\displaystyle r(0)^2\frac{t^4}4+\frac{t^3}3=o(t)$ as $t\to 0^+$, which contradicts the required inequality. Do you agree? $\endgroup$ – Hans May 18 '16 at 17:59
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, my mistake. Yes, I agree with you that the expression on the left-hand side converges faster to $0$ than $t$. If you would like to have feedback on the approach you have used, then please add your thoughts to the question. $\endgroup$ – saz May 18 '16 at 18:35
  • $\begingroup$ @saz: I just added a solved bounded deterministic case. $\endgroup$ – Hans May 18 '16 at 19:35
  • $\begingroup$ @saz: I have answered my question under the linear growth condition in $x$. What now happens with superlinear growth? $\endgroup$ – Hans May 28 '16 at 1:39

Suppose $(\mu,\sigma)$ obeys the linear growth condition $$\left|\mu(t,x)\right|+\left|\sigma(t,x)\right|<C(1+\left|x\right|),\ \forall t\in[0,T],\, x\in\mathbf R$$ for some positive constant $C$. By the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and the Gronwall inequality, $$\mathbf E[r^2]<3\mathbf E[r(0)^2]e^{a(1+T)t}, \forall t\in[0,T]$$ for some positive constant $a$. $$\mathbf E \Big[\Big(\int_0^t r(s)ds\Big)^2\Big]\le t\int_0^t \mathbf E[r(s)^2]ds\le 3\mathbf E[r(0)^2]e^{a(1+T)T}t^2 = O(t^2)$$ by Cauchy-Schwartz inequality and commutation of expectation and integration. Therefore the desired inequality does not hold.

Now the question is what happens when $(\mu,\sigma)$ has superlinear growth.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.