I am trying to understand some calculations in a paper by Sidney Coleman. He is showing that certain distributions are positive. The paper can be found here. What I am talking about is happening at the bottom of page 262. (Which is 4 pages into the document.)

We are looking at distributions in 2d space (scalar products evaluate as $a^\nu g_{\nu \mu} b^\mu=a^0b^0 -a^1b^1$): $$F(k)=\int d^2x\ e^{i k x} \langle0|\phi(x)\phi(0)|0\rangle \tag{11a}$$ $$F_{\mu}(k)=\int d^2x\ e^{i k x} \langle0|j_\mu(x)\phi(0)|0\rangle \tag{11b}$$ $$F_{\mu\nu}(k)=\int d^2x\ e^{i k x} \langle0|j_\mu(x)j_\nu(0)|0\rangle \tag{11c}$$

He says that $\int d^2x\ h(x) (aj_0(x)+b\phi(x))|0\rangle$ must have positive norm for any test function $h$ and any $a, b \in \mathbb C$. Ok, so far so good.

He then says that this implies $F_{00}$ and $F$ are positive distributions, which follows from a calculation.

It seems extremely straitforward, and if you look at $F_{00}$ and $F$ it seems clear that this must follow from considering $b=0$ for $F_{00}$ and $a=0$ for $F$.

However I cannot do the calculation and am feeling like an idiot. How does it work?

(Side point, it is also a bit unclear to me how these distributions act on test functions, do I take the Fourier transform of a function then multiply with $F(k)$ and integrate, or are we just taking the distribution associated to the (hopefully $L^1_\text{loc}$) function $F$?)


In the end it turns out that the key was a physical consideration. These correlation functions $\langle0|\phi(x)\phi(y)|0\rangle$ are Lorentz-invariant, which implies they only depend on the distance between $x$ and $y$. With that in mind the calculation is simple. From now on write $\langle0|\phi(x)\phi(0)|0\rangle=f(x)$.

In the case of $F$, let $g(k)$ be a positive test function, so write $g(k)=|\tilde h(k)|^2$ for some test function $\tilde h$. Then if $\tilde h(k)=\mathcal F(h)(k)$ is the Fourier transform of some Schwartz function $h$, we have $g(k)=\tilde h(k)\overline{\tilde h(k)}=\mathcal F(h *\overline{h \circ \iota})(k)$, where $\iota(x)=-x$. Putting that to use gives us

\begin{align} F(g)&=\int d^2k\int d^2x\ e^{ikx}\mathcal F\left(h *\overline{h \circ \iota}\right)(k) f(x)=\int d^2k \ \mathcal F\left(h *\overline{h \circ \iota}\right) \mathcal F(f)(k)\\ &=\int d^2k \ \mathcal F\left(h *\overline{h \circ \iota}*f\right)(k)=\left(h *\overline{h \circ \iota}*f\right)(0) \end{align}

Evaluating the convolutions:

$$F(g)=\left(h *\overline{h \circ \iota}*f\right)(0)=\int d^2x\ d^2x'\ h(x)\ (\overline{h\circ \iota})(0-x + x')\ f(x')$$

Doing a substitution $y=x-x'$ and putting in $f(x-y)=\langle0|\phi(x)\phi(y)|0\rangle$ then gives:

$$F(g)=\left(\int d^2x \ h(x) \langle0|\phi(x)\right)\left(\int d^2y \ \overline{h(y)} \phi(y)|0\rangle\right)$$

Which must be positive since it is the scalar product of $\left(\int d^2y \ \overline{h(y)} \phi(y)|0\rangle\right)$ with itself.

Thus $F(g)$ is positive whenever $g$ is positive and $F$ is a positive distribution.

For $F_{00}$ the proof is identical, except $\phi(x)$ is replaced by $j_0(x)$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.