2
$\begingroup$

A sequence $(f_1, \ldots, f_n)$ of elements of a commutative ring $R$ is said to be regular if for each $i$, $f_i$ is not a zero divisor in $R/(f_1, \ldots, f_{i-1})$. Call a sequence dimension dropping$^1$ if for each $i$, we have $\dim R/(f_1,\ldots,f_i) = \dim R/(f_1,\ldots,f_{i-1}) - 1$ (where $\dim$ denotes the Krull dimension of a ring).

For the polynomial ring $R=\mathbb{F}_2[x_1, \ldots, x_m]$ is it true that a sequence of elements is regular if and only if it is dimension dropping?

I think one can deduce that for this ring, regular implies dimension dropping by Krull's principal ideal theorem. And I also know that dimension dropping does not imply regular for general rings: for example, if $A = \mathbb{F}_2[x,y]/(x^2,xy)$, then $y$ is a zero divisor in $A$, but $\dim A = 1 \neq 0 =\dim A/(y)$.

Note that the sequence $(x^2,xy,y)$ in $\mathbb{F}_2[x,y]$ is not a counterexample to dimension dropping implying regular for the polynomial ring: the initial portion $(x^2,xy)$ is neither regular or dimension dropping.


$^1$ This is not standard terminology; is there a standard name for this?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I believe the terminology is a system of parameters in case $R$ is local. I believe the answer to your question is positive if $f_i$ are homogeneous or you are in the local setup. In a Cohen-Macaulay (local) ring, every system of parameters forms a regular sequence. $\endgroup$ – Youngsu May 16 '16 at 1:52
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks @Youngsu! That's excellent news. If you put that down as answer I'd be happy to accept it. (And if you added a reference I'd be even more grateful.) I didn't mention it because I didn't know it would be relevant, but I only needed this for homogeneous elements. $\endgroup$ – Omar Antolín-Camarena May 16 '16 at 18:11
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Homogeneous is necessary as far as my knowledge goes since all these statements are local (or graded). A general reference like Matsumura's book or Eisenbud's has the material. $\endgroup$ – Youngsu May 17 '16 at 4:47
3
$\begingroup$

What you ask is true without any restrictions for nice rings like polynomial rings. So, assume you have a sequence $f_1,\ldots, f_{k-1}$ and $f_k$ is dimension dropping in your terminology. Then $\dim R/(f_1,\ldots, f_{k-1})=\dim R-k+1$ and this quotient ring is also equidimensional Cohen-Macaulay. Thus, all its associated primes are minimal and since $f_k$ is dimension dropping, it can not belong to any of the minimal primes. Thus it is a non-zero divisor.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.