For a two-dimensional flow, the velocity is given by $\textbf u= (u(x,y,t),v(x,y,t),0)$. Define the stream function $ψ (x,y,t)$.

Evaluate $(\textbf u·∇) ψ$ and deduce a relationship between the stream function and streamlines.

For a two-dimensional flow, the vorticity is given by $ω = (0,0, \xi (x,y,t))$.

We now consider an inviscid steady two-dimensional flow. Evaluate $(\textbf u·∇)\xi$ and deduce a relationship between the vorticity $\xi(x,y)$ and the streamlines.

I am stuck on the bold parts. I am pretty sure that $$(\textbf u·∇) ψ=u\frac{\partial ψ}{\partial x}+v\frac{\partial ψ}{\partial y} $$ and $(\textbf u·∇)\xi=0$. But I don't know the relationships.

For the first bold part, is it just that the streamlines can be given by $ψ=\text{constant}$ for different constants because the stream function is constant on streamlines?

For the second bold bit, I have no idea.


In two-dimensional, incompressible flow we can define a stream function $\psi$ by a line integral along any path $C$ joining $(0,0)$ to $(x,y)$

$$\psi(x,y) = \int_C \mathbb{u} \cdot \mathbb{n} dl = \int_C u \, dy - v \, dx.$$

Using the incompressiblity condition $\nabla \cdot \mathbb{u} = 0$ and Green's theorem it follows that the line integral is independent of path and $\psi$ is a well-defined function which is related to the velocity field by

$$u = \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial y}, \,\,\,\ v = -\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x}. $$


$$\mathbb{u} \cdot \nabla \psi = u \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x} + v \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial y}= u(-v) + v(u) = 0.$$

The gradient $\nabla \psi$ is always oriented in a direction normal to a level curve $\psi = \text{constant}.$ The condition $\mathbb{u} \cdot \nabla \psi = 0$ implies that the velocity at a point is tangential to such a curve. Hence, level curves of $\psi$ correspond to streamlines.

We can relate the stream function and vorticity, using the definition $\mathbb{\omega} = \nabla \times \mathbb{u}$ by

$$\xi = \frac{\partial v}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial u}{\partial y} = \frac{\partial }{\partial x}\left(-\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x}\right) - \frac{\partial }{\partial y}\left(\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial y}\right) = -\nabla^2 \psi.$$

In steady inviscid flow we have the Euler equation

$$\mathbb{u} \cdot \nabla \mathbb{u} = -\frac{1}{\rho} \nabla p.$$

Taking the curl of both sides we find

$$\mathbb{u} \cdot \nabla \mathbb{\mathbb{\omega}} + \mathbb{\omega} \cdot \nabla \mathbb{\mathbb{u}} = 0.$$

Since $\mathbb{\omega}$ has only the non-zero $z-$ component $\xi$ this reduces to

$$\mathbb{u} \cdot \nabla \xi = 0,$$

and, by the same argument for the stream function, te vorticity must be constant along a streamline.

| cite | improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ There is a bit more to do. We have to show the relationship between vorticity and streamlines in inviscid flow. I know the answer -- the vorticity is constant on a streamline. Just need to add some more details. $\endgroup$ – RRL May 13 '16 at 22:45
  • $\begingroup$ Hi again, if you're not too busy, please could you help me with math.stackexchange.com/questions/1789671/… Thanks in advance!! $\endgroup$ – snowman May 17 '16 at 22:57

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.