5
$\begingroup$

I did the following proof earlier and just wanted conformation as to whether it works. The question was to show $$\frac{d}{dx}x^2=2x$$ by the difference-quotient definition of a derivative, and then prove that limit with the $\epsilon$, $\delta$ definition for limits.

I said that $$\frac{d}{dx}x^2=\lim_{h\to0}\frac{(x+h)^2-x^2}{h}=\lim_{h\to0}\frac{h^2+2xh}{h}$$ Then we assert that this is equal to $2x$ which we show is true using the $\epsilon$, $\delta$ definition. We must show that for all $\epsilon > 0$, there exists $\delta>0$ such that for all $|h-0|<\delta$ we have $$\left|2x-\frac{h^2+2xh}{h}\right|<\epsilon$$ Assuming $h\neq 0$ this simplifies to $$\left|2x-h-2x\right|=|-h|=|h|<\epsilon$$ So we're left with that for all $|h|<\delta$ we must have $|h|<\epsilon$, which is true for all $\epsilon$ if $\delta=\epsilon$. Hence we can conclude the limit does equal $2x$ and $$\frac{d}{dx}x^2=2x$$
I know its kind of a dull question, so if you have any cool insights or tips to share that'd be appreciated!

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Maybe try to prove $$\frac{d}{dx} x^n =nx^{n-1}$$ for $n \in \mathbb{N}$? :) $\endgroup$ – M. Van May 13 '16 at 1:18
6
$\begingroup$

Yes it is correct. A tip is to immediately write: $$\lim_{h \rightarrow 0} \frac{h^2+2xh}{h}=\lim_{h \rightarrow 0} 2x+h.$$ You can now see directly, to get $2x+h$ within $\epsilon>0$ of $2x$, we must choose $|h|<\epsilon$.

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

Note that if $f$ is a continuous function, and $f(0)$ exists, then $\lim_{h\to 0} f(h) = f(0)$ (this is just the definition of continuity).

This lets you immediately plug in $h=0$ in after dividing by $h$, avoiding the epsilon-delta portion of your argument.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.