1
$\begingroup$

Any function in $C[a,b]$ can be uniformly approximated by increasingly sequence of polynomials.

how to prove this?

My attempt:

By Weierstrass Approximation Theorem, for each $f\in C[a,b]\text{ and }\epsilon>0$,there is polynomial sequence $\{p_n\}$ such that exist $N>0$, for all $n>N$, $|f-p_n|\leq \epsilon$.

So for each $\epsilon>0$, for each $k$, define $\epsilon_k=\epsilon/2^k$, then there is polynomial $p_k$ such that $|f-p_k|\leq \epsilon/2^k$, then define $p_{k+1}=p_k+\epsilon_k$, then $p_k$ is increasing, and $|p_k-f|\leq \sum_{i=1}^{k-1}\epsilon/2^i<\sum_{i=1}^{\infty}\epsilon/2^i=\epsilon,k=1,2,3,...$

Is this proof correct?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Isn't that just the statement of the Weierstrass approximation theorem $\endgroup$ – Someguy May 12 '16 at 18:40
  • $\begingroup$ @user1952009 Original Weierstrass theorem doesn't have monotone $\endgroup$ – DuFong May 12 '16 at 18:42
  • $\begingroup$ you interpret increasingly as the sequence of polynomials is monotone ? i.e. $\max_{x \in [a,b]} |f(x)-P_n(x)| \to 0$ and $P_{n+1}(x) \ge P_n(x)$ ? $\endgroup$ – reuns May 12 '16 at 18:42
  • $\begingroup$ Yes. Though it seems trivial. $\endgroup$ – DuFong May 12 '16 at 18:54
  • $\begingroup$ and I understand nothing with what you are trying to do in your proof. you start from a sequnece $p_n$ such that $\|f-p_n\|_\infty \to 0$. then what ? (your $p_k$ doesn't seem depending on $p_n$) $\endgroup$ – reuns May 12 '16 at 18:57
3
$\begingroup$

No, what you wrote is not correct. It's very confused; the notation $p_k$ seems to mean more than one thing. Or something; you start with a sequence $p_k$ and then you define $p_{k+1}$ in terms of $p_k$...

Start with polynomials $p_k$ such that $|f-p_k|<2^{-k-3}$. Then $$f-2^{-k-3}<p_k<f+2^{-k-3}.$$So if you let $q_k=p_k-2^{-k}$ you have $$q_k<f-2^{-k-3}-2^{-k}<f-2^{-k-2}-2^{-k-1}<p_{k+1}-2^{-k-1}=q_{k+1}.$$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I mean Pick up one polynomial, then we can construct polynomial sequence recurringly $\endgroup$ – DuFong May 12 '16 at 19:57
  • $\begingroup$ @Benjamin Not by letting $p_{k+1}=p_k+\epsilon_k$ you can't. There's no way that's going to converge to $f$. $\endgroup$ – David C. Ullrich May 12 '16 at 20:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.