This question has been asked before but I want to lay out my method and get feedback on reasoning and process this took me a long to put together as I am new to the formatting:

Let the function $f$ be defined as $f$($x$,$y$,$z$) $=$ $x$$y$$z$

find the maximum and minimum values subject to the constraint: $g$($x$,$y$,$z$) $=$ $x^2$+2$y^2$+3$z^2$

Equation 1 $=$ $\nabla$$f_x$ $=$ $\lambda$ $\nabla$$g_x$ $=$ [ $yz$ $=$ $\lambda$2$x$]

Equation 2 $=$ $\nabla$$f_y$ $=$ $\lambda$ $\nabla$$g_y$ $=$ [ $xz$ $=$ $\lambda$4$y$]

Equation 3 $=$ $\nabla$$f_z$ $=$ $\lambda$ $\nabla$$g_z$ $=$ [ $yx$ $=$ $\lambda$6$z$]

It is my understanding that to solve these equations really just amounts to solving the relationship between values $x,y,z$ (and then plug into constraint) or the values themselves if there is an easy way to do so.

My basic instinct was to solve Equation 1 for $x$, obtaining: $x$ $=$ $\frac{yz}{2\lambda}$

Since Equation 3 consists of $x,y,z$ and I have x in terms of $y$ and $z$, then plugging $x$ into Equation 3 would get me the relationship of $y$ to $z$, giving me:

$\frac{yz}{2\lambda}$$\frac{y}{1}$ $=$ $\frac{\lambda6z}{1}$

Simplifying I then get: 12$z$$\lambda^2$ $=$ $y^2$$z$ Then Subtracting the right side over to the left and factoring out $z$ gives: $z$(12$\lambda^2$-$y^2$) $=$ 0

Giving me: $z$ $=$ 0 and 12$\lambda^2$ $-$ $y^2$ $=$ 0

$\lambda$ $\neq$ 0 because that would imply that $x=y=z=0$ which does not hold true in the constraint.

Now following from the above observation $z$ $\neq$ 0 because that would imply that $x=y=z=0$ which does not hold true in the constraint. This leaves 12$\lambda^2$ $-$ $y^2$ $=$ 0 for me to obtain values from.

Solving for $y$ I get: $y$ $=$ $\pm$ 2$\lambda$$\sqrt{3}$

I then plugged $y$ into the $x$ value I solved for in my first step: $x$ $=$ $\frac{yz}{2\lambda}$ and obtained:

$x$ $=$ $\pm$ $\sqrt{3}z$

From here I am lost. I can't seem to do anything to get the rest of the values and get numerical values. I would like my process addressed first and then suggestions, and by that I mean answering the question is there a way to proceed down the same route that I am going or was my process flawed from the start? The book gives the answer exactly as follows: maximum $\frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}$, minimum $\frac{-2}{\sqrt{3}}$. What does that even mean when checking my answers I am used to $f$($x,y,z$) $=$ $c$. I'm guessing that in this instance they are just giving me c.

Thank you

  • $\begingroup$ "find the maximum and minimum values subject to the constraint: $g$($x$,$y$,$z$) $=$ $x^2$+2$y^2$+3$z^2$" This is not a constraint, rather a definition of $g$. You might actually mean to ask: for some given $a>0$, find the maximum and minimum values of $f(x,y,z)$ subject to the constraint $g$($x$,$y$,$z$) $=a$, with $g(x,y,z)=$ $x^2$+2$y^2$+3$z^2$. $\endgroup$ – Did May 19 '16 at 5:54
  • $\begingroup$ This is somewhat similar to finding maximal possible volume of a parallelopiped in an ellipsoid. So looking at this post and other post which are linked there might perhaps help you. $\endgroup$ – Martin Sleziak May 19 '16 at 7:43

I have not been able to find the original question and I give you here my approach hoping it will help you.

We want to maiximize $xyz$ subject to the constraint $x^2+2 y^2+3 z^2=a$ with ($x\geq 0$) , ($y\geq 0$) , ($z \geq 0$).

So, let us consider $$F=x y z +\lambda \left(x^2+2 y^2+3 z^2-a\right)$$ Computing derivatives $$F'_x=y z+2 \lambda x=0\tag 1$$ $$F'_y=x z+4 \lambda y=0\tag 2$$ $$F'_z=x y+6 \lambda z=0\tag 3$$ $$F'_\lambda=x^2+2 y^2+3 z^2-a=0\tag 4$$ Now, I should consider equations $(1,2,3)$ and solve them for $x,y,z$ in terms of $\lambda$.

Using $(1)$ gives $x=-\frac{y z}{2 \lambda }$; plugging in $(2)$ leads to $y \left(4 \lambda -\frac{z^2}{2 \lambda }\right)=0$; plugging in $(3)$ leads to $z\left(6 \lambda -\frac{y^2}{2 \lambda }\right)=0$.

Considering all possibilities, the solutions of equations $(1,2,3)$ are then (hoping no mistakes) $$x=0\qquad y= 0\qquad z= 0$$ $$x= -2 \sqrt{6} \lambda \qquad y= -2 \sqrt{3} \lambda \qquad z=-2 \sqrt{2} \lambda$$

$$x= -2 \sqrt{6} \lambda \qquad y= +2 \sqrt{3} \lambda \qquad z=+ 2 \sqrt{2} \lambda$$ $$x= +2 \sqrt{6} \lambda \qquad y= -2 \sqrt{3} \lambda \qquad z= +2 \sqrt{2} \lambda$$

$$x= +2 \sqrt{6} \lambda \qquad y=+2 \sqrt{3} \lambda \qquad z= -2 \sqrt{2} \lambda$$ Using $(4)$, we just get $72 \lambda^2=a$, then $\lambda$ and the remaining follows.

  • $\begingroup$ Hmm your answers don't match the book though as they don't give the answers I stated. Do you know a different approach Claude. Thank you for taking the time to answer $\endgroup$ – K. Gibson May 13 '16 at 0:26
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @K.Gibson: There is an error in the solution. Multiply (1), (2) and (3) by $x$, $y$ and $z$ respectively to get: $2 x^2=4 y^2=6 z^2$. Use these to substitute for $x^2$ and $y^2$ with the appropriate multiple of $z^2$ in (4) and solve for $z=\pm\sqrt{2/3}$ ... continue from there. $\endgroup$ – Conrad Turner May 14 '16 at 5:41
  • $\begingroup$ Okay thank you that makes sense $\endgroup$ – K. Gibson May 14 '16 at 5:43
  • $\begingroup$ Okay so I just now got around to trying to work the problem out from what you said. Here is what I did. You said replace $x^2 and y^2$ with the appropriate multiples of z in 4 and solve. I found that $x$ was a multiple of $z$ by 3 and $y$ was a multiple of $z$ by $\frac{3}{2}$. Plugging them in I got 3+$\frac{3}{2}$+$3z^2-6$=0. My algebra lead me to $z$ = $\pm\frac{3}{\sqrt{2}}$ $\endgroup$ – K. Gibson May 18 '16 at 19:07
  • $\begingroup$ I got this by adding 6 over to the right then subtracted 3 leaving me: $\endgroup$ – K. Gibson May 18 '16 at 19:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.