3
$\begingroup$

Suppose we have a product manifold $M = M_1 \times M_2$. Let $\omega$ be a closed but inexact form on $M_1$ and $\eta$ a closed but inexact form on $M_2$. Then the claim is that $$\omega \wedge \eta$$ is inexact on the manifold $M$. I $\require{enclose}\enclose{horizontalstrike}{\mathrm{suspect}}$ know that the general statement "a product of inexact forms is inexact" is false, but I don't know how to go about proving the above claim.

The context of this question is in de Rham cohomology: I'm trying to prove Künneth's formula, and as a prelude I want to show that differential forms of the form above correspond to non-trivial elements of the cohomology groups of $M$.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ For a counterexample to the general case, it's not too hard to find inexact $\omega,\eta$ such that $\omega \wedge \eta = 0$. $\endgroup$ – Daniel Fischer May 6 '16 at 13:06
  • $\begingroup$ Ah that's obvious now, thank you $\endgroup$ – gj255 May 6 '16 at 13:21
1
$\begingroup$

I think the key here is de Rham's theorem, (part of) which can be pertinently paraphrased:

A closed $k$-form $\omega$ is exact if and only if $\int_c \omega = 0$ for every closed $k$-chain $c$.

The fact that

$$ \int_{c_1 \times c_2} \omega \wedge \eta = \int_{c_1} \omega \int_{c_2} \eta $$

is then all you need.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.