0
$\begingroup$

By definition:

$$Ax = \lambda x$$

for $x \neq 0$

I was using this to calculate the eigenvectors for $A$:

$$A = \begin{bmatrix}2 & 0 & 0\\1 & 3 & 0\\ 2 & 3& 4\end{bmatrix}$$

I already found that the eigenvalues for this matrix are:

$$\lambda = 2,3,4$$

However, when I began evaluating the eigenvectors for these eigenvalues, I noticed that for $\lambda = 4$, the resulting eigenvector is:

$$x = \begin{bmatrix}0\\0\\0\end{bmatrix}$$

But how is this possible??


Please help me find my mistake.

To find the eigenvectors, we must solve the equation:

$$(\lambda I -A)x = 0$$

$$\begin{bmatrix} 4 & 0 & 0\\0 & 4& 0\\ 0 & 0 & 4 \end{bmatrix} - \begin{bmatrix}2 & 0 & 0\\1 & 3 & 0\\ 2 & 3& 4\end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix}2 & 0 & 0\\-1 & 1 & 0\\ -2 & -3 & 0\end{bmatrix}$$

Row reducing, we see that

$$ \left[ \begin{array}{ccc|c} 1&0&0&0\\ 0&-1&0&0\\ 0&3&0&0 \end{array} \right] $$

...which tells us that $x_1=0, x_2=0, 3x_2=0$.

$\endgroup$
13
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ There is a nonzero eigenvector; you must have made a mistake somewhere. $\endgroup$ – Javier May 1 '16 at 19:27
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Well, it is always true that $(A-\lambda I) 0 = 0$, but an eigenvector must be non zero. In this case, you can 'read off' an eigenvector corresponding to $\lambda =4$ as $(0,0,1)^T$. $\endgroup$ – copper.hat May 1 '16 at 19:27
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The last line is wrong, $x_3$ is not $0$ from that equation system. $\endgroup$ – mathreadler May 1 '16 at 20:00
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @whatwhatwhat Au contraire: $\;z\;$ doesn't appear at all in the homogeneous system and it thus can take any value whatsoever! $\endgroup$ – DonAntonio May 1 '16 at 20:05
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ z is free choice because it has a 0 coefficient for each row. There is no equation that can restrict it if it is multiplied by 0 in the equations. $\endgroup$ – mathreadler May 1 '16 at 20:05
1
$\begingroup$

The resulting homogeneous system for $\lambda=4$ ( i.e., $\;(\lambda I-A)\vec x=\vec0\;$) is:

$$\begin{cases}2x=0\\-x+y=0\\-2x-3y=0\end{cases}\implies\;\;x=y=0\implies \begin{pmatrix}0\\0\\1\end{pmatrix}$$

is an eigenvector for $\;\lambda=4\;$ and, in fact, it is a basis for the corresponding eigenspace

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ The difference between my work and yours is the $x+y$. I got $-x+y$. I got a negative value for $x$ because when doing $\lambda I -A$ we see that the 1st column 2nd row of $\lambda I$ is $0$. Subtracting the corresponding value from $A$, we get $0-1=-1$. $\endgroup$ – whatwhatwhat May 1 '16 at 19:43
  • $\begingroup$ So how did you get a positive value? $\endgroup$ – whatwhatwhat May 1 '16 at 19:43
  • $\begingroup$ @whatwhatwhat Thank you, you're completely right: it must be $\;-x\;$ there and, in fact, also $\;-2x-3y=0\;$ in the last equation. I did it in my mind and, of course, it makes no difference in this case. I shall edit now. $\endgroup$ – DonAntonio May 1 '16 at 19:52
0
$\begingroup$

There seems to be some confusion here. The eigenvalues solve the characteristic equation $\det({\bf A}-\lambda {\bf I}) = 0$ , but there can be several eigenvalues for one eigenvector (multiple roots). Take for example the matrix $$A = \left[\begin{array}{ccc} 2&0&0\\1&2&0\\0&0&4 \end{array}\right] \hspace{1cm} A-2I = \left[\begin{array}{ccc} 0&0&0\\1&0&0\\0&0&2 \end{array}\right]$$

This only gives one vector ($[0,1,0]^T$), although there are two roots $\lambda = 2$.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

You made a mistake, the (normed) eigenvector for the eigenvalue $4$ is $e_z$.

>> A
A =

   2   0   0
   1   3   0
   2   3   4

>> [x,y]=eig(A)
x =

   0.00000   0.00000   0.66667
   0.00000   0.31623  -0.66667
   1.00000  -0.94868   0.33333

y =

Diagonal Matrix

   4   0   0
   0   3   0
   0   0   2

And this is easy to verify as $e_z = (0,0,1)^t$ picks the third column, $(0,0,4)^t$, of $A$ and this is $4 \cdot e_z$.

By hand you would solve $A_1 u = 0$ for $$ A_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 2 - 4 & 0 & 0 \\ 1 & 3-4 & 0 \\ 2 & 3 & 4-4 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} -2 & 0 & 0 \\ 1 & -1 & 0 \\ 2 & 3 & 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ This has the solutions $u = (x,y,z) = (0,0,z)$ for arbitrary $z \in \mathbb{R}$. Here is the Gauss elimination, using augmented matrices:

$$ A_1 u = 0 \iff \\ \left[ \begin{array}{rrr|c} -2 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 1 & -1 & 0 & 0 \\ 2 & 3 & 0 & 0 \end{array} \right] \to \left[ \begin{array}{rrr|c} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 1 & -1 & 0 & 0 \\ 2 & 3 & 0 & 0 \end{array} \right] \to \left[ \begin{array}{rrr|c} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 3 & 0 & 0 \end{array} \right] \to \left[ \begin{array}{rrr|c} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 3 & 0 & 0 \end{array} \right] \to \left[ \begin{array}{rrr|c} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{array} \right] $$

Update:

...which tells us that x1=0,x2=0,x3=0.

No it does not. It just tells you $x_1$ and $x_2$ are zero.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ I don't understand what this is supposed to tell me. $\endgroup$ – whatwhatwhat May 1 '16 at 19:44
  • $\begingroup$ $x$ is the matrix of eigenvectors, $y$ is the diagonal matrix with the corresponding eigenvalues. In other words I asked my machine for the results to compare with yours. $\endgroup$ – mvw May 1 '16 at 19:45

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.