If we consider an elliptic curve $E/k$ given in Weierstrass form $y^{2}+a_{1}xy+a_{3}y=x^{3}+a_{2}x^{2}+a_{4}x+a_{6}$, then I know that the translation maps $\tau_{P}$ with $P\in{E}$ fix the invariant differential $\omega_{E}=\frac{dx}{2y+a_{1}x+a_{3}}$, i.e. $\tau_{P}^{*}\omega_{E}=\omega_{E}$. But I'm wondering if the converse is true? Namely, if $\phi:E\rightarrow{E}$ is an automorphism of $E/k$ such that $\phi^{*}\omega_{E}=\omega_{E}$, then $\phi$ should be a translation map?

My only attempt is assuming that $\phi$ is of the form $(x,y)\mapsto{(u^{2}x+r,u^{3}y+u^{2}sx+t)}$ for some $u\in{k^{*}}$ and $r,s,t\in{k}$ (I think we can assume this) and applying the definition directly


which by hypothesis is equal to $\omega_{E}$ again. This seems to suggest that $u=1$ and $s=0$, and also $2t+a_{1}r=0$. So $\phi$ is of the form $(x,y)\mapsto{(x+r,y+t)}$. Is it possible to conclude from this that $\phi$ is a translation map? How can I do that?


[Corrected (mistake in characteristic 2: multiplication by $-1$ always fixes $\omega_E$)]

The converse is true, except in characteristic 2 and for some supersingular $E/k$ in characteristic 3.

Composing $\phi$ with translation by $-\phi(0)$ yields an automorphism $\psi: E \to E$ sending $0$ to $0$ and inducing the same action on $\omega_E$ as the $\phi$. Let $A$ be the group of automoprhisms sending $0$ to $0$.

Assume first that $E$ is not a supersingular curve in characteristic $2$ or $3$. Then $A$ is cyclic, usually of order $2$ except that curves with $j=1728$ and $j=0$ have an automorphism of order $4$ or $6$ if $k$ contains the correpsonding roots of unity. In this case the homomorphism $A \to k^*$ obtained from the action on $\omega_E$ is injective, except in characteristic 2 where $-1=1$ so the multiplication-by-$(-1)$ map also fixed $\omega_E$.

If $k$ is algebraically closed of characteristic $p=2$ or $3$, and $E$ is supersingular, then $A$ is non-abelian of order $24$ or $12$ respectively, so the map to $k^*$ cannot be injective because a finite subgroup of $k^*$ is cyclic. For $p=2$ the kernel still contains $-1$ as before, but also six further automorphisms, for a total of $8$, which constitute a quaternion group; the image of $A$ in $k^*$ consists of the cube roots of unity. For $p=3$ the kernel is cyclic of order $3$, and the image consists of the 4th roots of unity; but if $k$ is not algebraically closed then the kernel might still be trivial.

Explicit examples of non-identity $\psi$ with $\psi^* \omega_E = \omega_E$:

In characteristic 2, take $E: y^2 + y = x^3$, with $\omega_E = dx$. Let $\psi(x,y) = (x+1, y+x+\eta)$ where $\eta^2 + \eta = 1$. Note that $\psi^2$: $(x,y) \mapsto (x,y+1)$is multiplication by $-1$.

In characteristic 3, take $E: y^2 = x^3 - x$, with $\omega_E = dx/y = dy$. Let $\psi(x,y) = (x+1, y)$. However, for $y^2 = x^3 + x$ over the prime field ${\bf Z} / 3{\bf Z}$, the kernel is trivial because the only nontrivial automorphisms fixing both $0$ and $\omega_E$ are $(x,y) \mapsto (x \pm i,y)$ with $i^2 = -1$.

  • $\begingroup$ thanks for answer! Do you mind if you could tell me what is the homomorphism $A\rightarrow{k^{*}}$ and why is it injective? Is it the map given by $\phi\mapsto{\lambda}$ where $\phi\in{A}$, $\lambda\in{\overline{k}(E)^{*}}$ and $\phi^{*}\omega_{E}=\lambda\omega_{E}$? how do you know that $\lambda\in{k^{*}}$? $\endgroup$ – antonioACR1 May 7 '16 at 4:52
  • $\begingroup$ oh ok nevermind, I think the injectivity is explained in the proof of corollary 5.6, chapter III in Silverman's book. $\endgroup$ – antonioACR1 May 7 '16 at 5:50
  • $\begingroup$ Since $A$ is finite, some power of $\phi$ is the identity, so $\lambda$ is invertible (and indeed a root of unity). But I messed up earlier; see the corrected answer. $\endgroup$ – Noam D. Elkies May 7 '16 at 21:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.