I've been doing some excersices about inner product and I found something interesting but I don't know if my approach is correct at all.

Supose that ${v_{1}, v_{2}, ..., v_{n}}$ is a base for a vector space V over $\mathbb{R}$, with a real inner product $<. , .>$, then for any set of ${r_{1}, r_{2}, ..., r_{n}}∈R$ there exists an unique $w∈V$ such that: $<v_{i}, w> = r_{i}$

I started proving the uniqueness: supose that there exists $w,u∈V$ such that $<v_{i}, u> = <v_{i}, w> = r_{i}$ for every $i=1,2,...,n$ and given ${r_{1}, r_{2}, ..., r_{n}}∈R$. Since ${v_{1}, v_{2}, ..., v_{n}}$ is a base for V, we can write:

$u = a_{1}v_{1} + a_{2}v_{2} + ... + a_{n}v_{n}$

$w = b_{1}v_{1} + b_{2}v_{2} + ... + b_{n}v_{n}$

For uniques $b_{1},a_{1},b_{2},a_{2},...,b_{n},a_{n}∈\mathbb{R}$

It is easy to see that, $<v_{i}, u - w> =0$ for $i =1,2,...,n$ and if $z∈V$ is a non zero vector, I found that $<z, u - w> = 0$ and therefore $u-w = 0$

Now, we have to prove the existence. We can write the hypothesis this way: let $A =( a_{i,j} )$ be an nxn matrix such that $a_{i,j} = <v_{i},v_{j}>$ and let $ \begin{align} r &= \begin{bmatrix} r_{1} \\ r_{2} \\ \vdots \\ r_{n} \end{bmatrix} \end{align}$

And consider the $Ax = O$ system of equations, since it has a solution $x = O$, by the previous proof, $x = O$ is the unique solution and therefore, the columns of A are linearly independent, since A has n columns then these columns span $\mathbb{R}^n$.

So, we can write $r$ as a linear combination of the columns of A, and that is, having a solution for $Ax = r$, then we write the explicit form of the equations and use the bilinear property of $<.,.>$ to find out that the components of $x$ are the components of the $w$ we wanted to find.

My question is: if we supose that $Ax = b$ has unique solutions for any $b$, and $A$ is an nxn matrix, then $Ax = b$ has a solution for any $b∈\mathbb{R}^n$. Is that correct?


That's correct. If $Ax=b$ has a unique solution for any $b$, then the columns of $A$ are linearly independent. If they were linearly dependent then, on the one hand, the columns of $A$ wouldn't span all of $\mathbb{R}^n$ and there would be a solution for every $b$; on the other hand, for those unlikely $b$ for which there is a solution, the solution would not be unique since the columns are linearly dependent and therefore there exists a nontrivial linear combination of those columns that equals zero.

So the columns of $A$ are linearly independent and now we can state the converse: when the columns of $A$ are linearly independent, they span the entire $\mathbb{R}^n$ and each element of $\mathbb{R}^n$ is represented uniquely.

  • $\begingroup$ I think you mean "...and there wouldn't be a solution for every $b$". $\endgroup$ – TonyK Jun 24 '16 at 21:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.