0
$\begingroup$

Let $\Delta _{2}$ be a 2-simplex, $I=\left [ 0,1 \right ]$. Given are two maps $i_{0}:\Delta _{2}\rightarrow \Delta _{2}\times I$, defined by $x \mapsto (x,0)$ and $i_{1}:\Delta _{2}\rightarrow \Delta _{2}\times I$, defined by $x \mapsto (x,1)$. Need to show that the induced chain maps are chain homotopic.

Since the two inclusions are homotopic, they map the 2-simplex to the upper and lower triangle of the prism $\Delta _{2}\times I$. The induced chain maps are $(i_{0})_{\#}:C(\Delta _{2})\rightarrow C(\Delta _{2}\times I)$ and $(i_{1})_{\#}:C(\Delta _{2})\rightarrow C(\Delta _{2}\times I)$. By definition of chain homotopy we have to look for a prism operator $P_{n}:C_{n}(\Delta_{2}) \rightarrow C_{n+1}(\Delta_{2} \times I)$ such that $\partial P+P\partial =(i_{1})_\#-(i_{0})_\#$. I am struggling to show formally the chain homotopy.

Can anybody help me, please? I appreciate any help and comments. Thank you very much!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Are you working with singular or simplicial theory ? $\endgroup$ – Rene Schipperus Apr 26 '16 at 21:21
  • $\begingroup$ Simplicial theory $\endgroup$ – Lullaby Apr 26 '16 at 21:23
  • $\begingroup$ Ok, so you have a triangulation of $\Delta_2\times I $ ? $\endgroup$ – Rene Schipperus Apr 26 '16 at 21:25
  • $\begingroup$ Basically, if $\sigma$ is an $n$ simplex then $P_n(\sigma)=\sigma \times I$, or what ever chain represents the triangulation of that set. $\endgroup$ – Rene Schipperus Apr 26 '16 at 21:28
  • $\begingroup$ I guess it is the same like the triangulation for the singular case? The three tetrahedra? $\endgroup$ – Lullaby Apr 26 '16 at 21:30
1
$\begingroup$

So we can actually build up the answer inductively here: let's label the simplices of $\Delta_2$ as $v_0, v_1, v_2$, and the corresponding vertices of the top and bottom faces of $\Delta_2 \times I$ as $t_0, t_1, t_2, b_0, b_1, b_2$.

So let's define $P$ on $C_0(\Delta_2)$. Here $\partial P + P\partial = \partial P$ (as $\partial$ vanishes on 0-simplices) and we want $\partial P([v_i]) = [t_i] - [b_i]$, so let $P([v_i]) = [t_i, b_i]$.

Go up a dimension and define $P$ on $C_1(\Delta_2)$. For concreteness, let's figure out $P([v_0, v_1])$. We have $$\partial P([v_0, v_1]) = [t_0, t_1] - [b_0, b_1] - P([v_0]) + P([v_1]) = [t_0, t_1] - [b_0, b_1] - [t_0, b_0] + [t_1, b_1]$$ This implies we want $P([v_0, v_1]) = [t_0, t_1, b_0] + [t_1, b_1, b_0]$ (this is much clearer if you draw a little picture! The four edges we have give you a square on the side of $\Delta_2 \times I$, and we've split it up into two triangles.)

Hopefully you can see how to continues this to the other edges and to the 2-simplex itself!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much for your help! $\endgroup$ – Lullaby Apr 29 '16 at 19:32

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.