Let $A$ be a commutative $\mathbb Z$-algebra and $M$ be a $\mathbb Z\oplus \mathbb Z$-module. Then $A\otimes_{\mathbb Z} M$ is an $A\oplus A$-module. Is it true that $(A\oplus A)\otimes_{\mathbb Z\oplus \mathbb Z} M \cong A\otimes_{\mathbb Z} M$ as $A\oplus A$-modules? It seems to me that the map given by $$(a_1, a_2)\times m \mapsto a_1\otimes_{\mathbb Z} (1,0)m + a_2\otimes_{\mathbb Z} (0,1) m$$ defines a map in one direction, and that the map $$a\times m\rightarrow (a,a)\otimes_{\mathbb Z\oplus \mathbb Z} m$$ defines its inverse.

More generally, is it true/ is there a slick reason that given commutative unital $R$-algebras $A$, $B$ and $C$ such that $B\cong A\otimes_{R} C$, and a $C$-module $M$, we have $B\otimes_C M\cong A\otimes_{R} M$ as $B$-modules?


Yes. You ask if in general $$ (A \otimes_R C) \otimes_C M = A \otimes_R M, $$ when both sides make sense. This is true; the map is $(a \otimes c) \otimes m\mapsto a\otimes cm$ with inverse map $$ a \otimes m \mapsto (a \otimes 1) \otimes m. $$ Of course there's a lot to check here before you believe me.

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ (alternatively, prove the tensor product is associative and reduce to $C \otimes_C M = M$.) $\endgroup$ – user29743 Jul 27 '12 at 19:51

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.