I was reading through Serre's Linear Representation Theory book and encountered a question to show that the set of all irreducible characters of an abelian group form a group.

The proof of closure was given, since if we have two character functions $\chi_1, \chi_2$ of irreducible representations $V,W$ then $\chi_1 * \chi_2$ is the character of the irreducible representation $V \otimes W$.

Additionally the trivial character serves as an identity element.

But I don't see how to take inverses of characters.

Attempted Ideas:

If there is a way to define an inverse tensor product, so that given $U,V$ we have that $f(U,V) = Z | Z \otimes V = U$, then I could try to compute the inverse tensor product of a representation, with the trivial representation, and hope that the character laws travel too. But I'm not sure how to define such an operator.

  • $\begingroup$ Then what exactly does the author mean when he writes: " let $\hat{G}$ be the set of irreducible characters of $G$. If $\chi_1, \chi_2$ belong to $\hat{G}$, the same is true of their product $\chi_1 \chi_2$ "? I know that the character of the tensor product of two representations, is the product of their characters. Does that mean there is a different representation, whose character is the product of the two original characters, that is not the tensor product of the two original representations? $\endgroup$ Apr 25 '16 at 14:03
  • $\begingroup$ hmm... the original comment appears to have disappeared. $\endgroup$ Apr 25 '16 at 14:04
  • $\begingroup$ (I did not see the word "abelian", that was my mistake.) $\endgroup$ Apr 25 '16 at 14:04
  • $\begingroup$ the characters are a group simply because each character $\chi$ has an inverse $\overline{\chi}$, and that $\chi_1 \chi_2$ is also a character ? $\endgroup$
    – reuns
    Apr 25 '16 at 14:05
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @frogeyedpeas : sorry this is only true for characters on finite groups, the characters on $\mathbb{Z}$ are not of modulus $1$, nevertheless $1/\chi(g)$ is a character $\endgroup$
    – reuns
    Apr 25 '16 at 14:09

The inverse is given by taking the dual representation, which has character the complex conjugate of the original character. In the $1$-dimensional case this is the inverse of the original character.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.