1
$\begingroup$

Having the equation $$x^{2}y''+xy'+x^{2}y=0$$

I get the indicial equation at get r=0, and am left with the equation. $$r^{2}a_{0}x^{r}+(r^{2}+2r+1)a_{1}x^{r+1}+\sum^{\infty}_{0}\big[[(n+r+2)(n+r+1)+(n+r+2)]a_{n+2}+a_{n}\big]x^{n+r+2}=0$$

subbing in r=0 gives: $$a_{1}x+\sum^{\infty}_{0} [(n+2)^2a_{n+2}+ a_{n}]x^{n+2}=0$$

So im not sure how to get the recurrence relation as i don't have an $a_{n+1}$ to find this and also i have an $a_{1}$ term so am not sure how to find this. Any help would be appreciated thank you.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Note that the second term in your second equation implies that $a_1 = 0$ and thus $$a_1 = a_3 = a_5 = \cdots = 0 $$ by the recurrence relation. Now compute $$a_2, a_4, a_6 \dots$$ using the recurrence relation. A clear pattern should emerge that will allow you to write down an expression for $a_{2k}$. Then, a solution is $$y=\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_{2n} x^{2n}.$$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ This is flat-out wrong. Even though all coefficients go to zero at $x=0$, the ratio $Q/P$ is singular there making $x=0$ a singular point. $\endgroup$ – Oscar Lanzi Apr 25 '16 at 2:21
  • $\begingroup$ @OscarLanzi Are you sure? I was taught in my PDE's class that at least one of $Q$ or $R$ is non-zero to get a RSP. Feel free to edit my answer if you are absolutely sure. I certainly don't want to mislead the OP. $\endgroup$ – MathMajor Apr 25 '16 at 2:25
  • $\begingroup$ This is Bessel's equation and the solution is $y=c_1J_0(x)+c_2N_0(x)$ and $N_0(x)$ does indeed have a logarithmic singularity at the origin. So some blood will be shed on the way to the general solution. $\endgroup$ – user5713492 Apr 25 '16 at 3:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.