So I actually have two questions.

  1. Is it even Possible to raise a number to the power of a number with its own exponent? Kind of like an exponent within an exponent....? It doesn't sound right to me but here is why I ask (also my second question)

  2. The equation is: $y=3E-15e^{0.0197x}$

I know the E stands for exponential notation so that would be $3*10^{-15}$, then is that multiplied by $e^{0.0197x}$ or is the $e^{0.0197x}$ part of the power of the exponential notation? (I really hope that makes sense...)

So the reason for my first question is because if the equation was $3*10^{(-15e^{0.0197x})}$ Then you would have to raise $10$ to the power of $-15e$ which is also being raised to a power... It sounds like a pyramid scheme to me 😜

****I'm far from stupid but I have absolutely no problem with your answers being "dumbed" down.

  • $\begingroup$ You know about using nested levels of parentheses, right? Same thing. I presume you aren't baffled by $1+(1+(1+1))$... $\endgroup$ – MPW Apr 23 '16 at 4:53
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ In math we don't use scientific number notation like 3E-15, instead we write what it means: $3\times10^{-15}$. $\endgroup$ – Marc van Leeuwen Apr 23 '16 at 4:59
  • $\begingroup$ Marc van Leeuwen I have seen quite a few of your answers amongst different posts and you are quite sassy! I'm not baffled by anything hear just asking a question because it's a homework assignment and I like to get good grades instead of assuming I know everything and making mistakes! And in math we do use Exponential Notation otherwise I wouldn't be dealing with it in my College Algebra coarse! $\endgroup$ – user7075 Apr 23 '16 at 5:43

Any power of a positive number is just another number. You can do anything with that number that you can do with numbers, including using them as exponent to another positive number.

However $y=$3E-15$e^{0.0197x}$ would stand for $y=3\times 10^{-15}\times e^{0.0197x}$, since the E notation only accepts an explicit integer, and the power of $e$ just has to be multiplied with the number that preceeds it. So in this case there is no repeated exponentiation.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.