2
$\begingroup$

Given a vector $p$, to rotate it by a quaternion $q$, we use the formula:

$$p' = q p \hat{q}$$

where $\hat{q}$ is the conjugate of $q$. But if we use rotational matrices, then it's just

$$p' = Rp$$

While it's clear why the matrices work this way, I just cannot develop any intuition on quaternion rotation formula. I realise the formula does work, but still my guts feel as if it was “rotate $p$ by $q$ and then compose it with the inverse rotation of $q$”. Maybe there is some simple explanation?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ For instance, $p\mapsto qp$ does not even stabilize pure quaternions. $\endgroup$ – Captain Lama Apr 22 '16 at 20:44
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, for starters, remember that in one case you're treating $p$ as a vector in $\Bbb R^3$ and in the other you're treating it as a quaternion (i.e., vector in $\Bbb R^4$). $\endgroup$ – Ted Shifrin Apr 22 '16 at 20:45
  • $\begingroup$ There are very good explanations in math.stackexchange.com/q/302465 $\endgroup$ – Jean Marie Apr 22 '16 at 21:13
0
$\begingroup$

Lets try to develop the formula:

$$p' = q p \hat{q} = \left(\begin{array}{cc} \vec{p'} \\ 0\end{array} \right) = \left(\begin{array}{cc} \vec{u}\sin{\phi\over2} \\ \cos{\phi\over2}\end{array} \right) \otimes \left(\begin{array}{cc} \vec{p} \\ 0\end{array} \right) \otimes \left(\begin{array}{cc}- \vec{u}\sin{\phi\over2} \\ \cos{\phi\over2}\end{array} \right) $$

In which $\vec{u}$ and $\phi$ are the axis and angle of the rotation represented by the quaternion. After various transformation that I will omit for sake of brevity you obtain

$$ \vec{p'} = \vec{p}_\perp \cos{\phi} + \left( \vec{u}\times \vec{p}\right)\sin{\phi} + \vec{p_\parallel}$$

That is the 3D vector rotation formula. Moreover, considering both $$p' = q p \hat{q}$$ $$p' = Rp$$

You can derive the result:

$$\left(\hat{q}\right)^\oplus \left(q\right)^+ = \left(\begin{array}{cc}R & 0\\ 0 & 1\end{array}\right)$$

where R is the rotation you were referring to.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ That seems to be correct :), though I am still troubled what is the intuition for this... $\endgroup$ – ntg Aug 17 '16 at 12:12

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.