-2
$\begingroup$

I'm looking for a closed-form formula for the number of partitions of integer $n$ into integer parts less than or equal to 9. Thanks.

$\endgroup$

closed as off-topic by Travis, colormegone, zz20s, Leucippus, Daniel W. Farlow Apr 22 '16 at 14:57

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Travis, colormegone, zz20s
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ PLease give more details. i.e. the context of the question, so that we can see if there's another way than painstakingly calculating this. P.S. I second @N.S.JOHN $\endgroup$ – SinTan1729 Apr 22 '16 at 14:24
  • $\begingroup$ Partitions of integer. $\endgroup$ – user75619 Apr 22 '16 at 14:31
  • $\begingroup$ You mean non-zero partitions. Right? $\endgroup$ – SinTan1729 Apr 22 '16 at 14:32
  • $\begingroup$ Stars and Bars Theorem : This might be what you're looking for. You can easily adjust it for the partitions to be non-zero. $\endgroup$ – SinTan1729 Apr 22 '16 at 14:34
  • $\begingroup$ Yes. I'm interested in the number of ways integer $n$ can be represented as sum of other integers greater than 1, but less than or equal to 9. $\endgroup$ – user75619 Apr 22 '16 at 14:34
2
$\begingroup$

One can show that the number $p_k(n)$ of partitions of $n$ into exactly $k$ parts is equal to the number of partitions of $n$ in which the largest part has size $k$. So you are looking for a formula for $p_9(k)$. Rubinstein has given an explicit formula for $p_k(n)$ in terms of Bernoulli polynomials, see here. A. Sills has given Rademacher-type formulas for the restricted partition function.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks. I'll give it a try. I was hoping for a closed-form formula as a function of integer $n$ though. I've consulted with "Integer partitions" by Andrews. In there closed-form formulas for $p_3(k)$ and $p_4(k)$ are derived, and $p_5(k)$ is provided and is asked to be proven. I have a feeling his approach can deliver formula for $p_9(k)$ as well, but it promises to be quite arduous, so I thought someone must have already done that. :) $\endgroup$ – user75619 Apr 22 '16 at 14:39
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, Sills has an explicit formula of Rademacher-type, i.e., like the explicit formula for the unrestricted partition function $p(n)$ by Rademacher (see Andrew's book). $\endgroup$ – Dietrich Burde Apr 22 '16 at 14:42
  • $\begingroup$ Could you me direct towards Sills results? Where do I find them? $\endgroup$ – user75619 Apr 22 '16 at 14:51
  • $\begingroup$ Here is a link, and a free one also here. $\endgroup$ – Dietrich Burde Apr 22 '16 at 15:12
  • $\begingroup$ I actually found this: math.rutgers.edu/~zeilberg/tokhniot/oPARTITIONS1 Formulas in terms of quasi-polynomials for $p_k(n)$ for $k$s up to 60. Only problem is I don't get how to sum quasi-polynomials. For example, for $k=3$ it is suggested one should add these quasi-polynomials: $[[n^2/12+n/2+47/72], [-1/8, 1/8], [-1/9, -1/9, 2/9]]$. Is it something you would happen to know? Thanks. $\endgroup$ – user75619 Apr 22 '16 at 15:32

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.