3
$\begingroup$

I have heard that in quantum physics negative probabilities show up in certain distributions.

Could you give an example that aids int he intuitional interpretation of a negative probability?

For example, what does $X \sim N(0,1) -\delta$ mean, and how does it relate to $Y \sim N(0,1)$. Can we say anything about the relationship between $Y$ and $X$?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You might want to have a look at signed measures: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signed_measure I've also understood that they are trying to get rid of the negative probabilities by defining observables as Positive Operator Valued Measures insetead of self-adjoint operators. The point being that negative probabilities are considered artifacts produced by the theory instead of something with an actual interpretation. $\endgroup$ – Matias Heikkilä Apr 20 '16 at 11:09
  • $\begingroup$ That is a fair but saddening answer. $\endgroup$ – Dionysios Georgiadis Apr 20 '16 at 11:10
5
$\begingroup$

I don't think anyone has a clear understanding of negative probabilities.

There seems to be a rather good axionmatic background (http://physics.bu.edu/~youssef/quantum/Burgin-1.pdf) and the definition of an extended probability space ("extended" means either positive or negative) is rather well defined mathematically. There are events and anti-events that cancel eachother when elements of a set : $\{w,-w\}\approx\emptyset$.

Honestly I can't validate the content of the acticle personnaly since I read superficially and find it hard to read.

But what does it mean intuitively ?

Assume you have two cases $A$ and $\overline{A}$ (not $A$) each with probability 0.5 to make it simple. If an event $X$ has probabiliy 0.3 when $A$ is true ($P(X|A)=0.3$), and has probability -0.3 when $A$ is false ($P(X|\overline{A})=-0.3$), or equivalently the antievent $-X$ has probability 0.3 when not $A$, then as a whole, X has probability $0$. Thus X never happens.

I don't think anyone on earth understands it further than this.

You can find it explained here by Feynman : https://johncarlosbaez.wordpress.com/2013/07/19/negative-probabilities/ . Maybe the most important motivation for negative probabilities is Quantum Mechanics and most significantly the Wiegner quasi-distribution.

It's like a cancelation happens : $-X$ cancels $X$. This is rather intuitive. But this happens between two cases ($A$ and $\overline{A}$) that cannot happen together. I've never read a text giving an intuivie catch of this. It is directly related to some of the greatest mystery of Quantum Mechanics.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.