2
$\begingroup$

Definition
Let $p\in \mathbb{Z}$, $a<b \in \mathbb{R}$, and $X$, $Y$ be real Hilbert spaces. We define $$ W^{1,p}(a,b,X,Y) := \left\{ \varphi \, \Big| \, \varphi \in L^p(a,b,X),\, \varphi' \in L^p(a,b,Y) \right\}.$$

I am working with the Bidomain-Model which, over a time intervall [0,T], describes the electrical behaviour of the myocardial muscle considered as $\Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^3$.
This model has partial differential equations which involve the intra- and extracellular voltages, $u$ and $v$, which are functions of this type: $$ u=u(t,x):[0,T]\times\Omega\rightarrow\mathbb{R}$$ $$ v=v(t,x):[0,T]\times\Omega\rightarrow\mathbb{R}$$

The model-equation which describes the relationship between these two is $$ 0 = A_iu-Cv $$ with the operators $ A_i = -div(\sigma_i\nabla \cdot)$ and $ C = div\left((\sigma_i + \sigma_e)\nabla \cdot \right)$, for my pourposes.
As most of us know, if we use a computer to simulate the model, we would get approximations $\widetilde{u}$ and $\widetilde{v}$ and thus the norm $$ \|A_i\widetilde{u}-C\widetilde{v} \|$$
becomes relevant.
In order to analytically represent and bound this residual, I am still missing to see in which space the functions $$\text{res}(t,x):=A_i\widetilde{u}(t,x)-C\widetilde{v}(t,x) \qquad \text{and}$$ $$\dot{\text{res}},$$ its time derivative, live and which norms this spaces have.

Is it true that $$ \text{res} : [0,T] \rightarrow H^1(\Omega) \quad \text{and}$$ $$ \dot{\text{res}} : [0,T] \rightarrow \left[H^1(\Omega) \rightarrow \mathbb{R}\right]\text{?}$$ Does $$ \text{res} \in L^{2} \left(0,T,H^1(\Omega)\right) \,\, \text{and}$$ $$ \dot{\text{res}} \in L^{2} \left(0,T,H^1(\Omega)'\right)\text{?} \quad$$ Thus following that $$ \text{res} \in W^{1,2}\left(0,T,H^1(\Omega),H^1(\Omega)'\right) \,\, \text{?}$$

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

It all seems to be right except for some fine details.
$\dot{\text{res}}$ can be interpreted in two ways:
First, as a function $$ \dot{\text{res}} : [0,T] \rightarrow H^1(\Omega),$$ which maps time-points to (state)functions in $ H^1(\Omega)$. Under this interpretation $$\dot{\text{res}} \in L^2\left(0,T,H^1(\Omega)\right).$$
Second, as a linear form $$ \dot{\text{res}} : [0,T] \rightarrow H^1(\Omega)^*,$$ which maps time-points to rate-of-change-functions over (state)functions in $ H^1(\Omega)$. This means that $\dot{\text{res}}$ is a linear form over $H^1(\Omega)$, thus $$\dot{\text{res}} \in L^2\left(0,T,H^1(\Omega)^*\right).$$ Forthermore you should have in mind that thanx to the Fréchet-Riesz representation theorem it holds that $$ L^2\left(0,T,H^1(\Omega)\right) \cong L^2\left(0,T,H^1(\Omega)^*\right).$$ This spaces are isometrically isomorphic and this is what lies behind the fact, that $\dot{\text{res}}$ can be interpreted as a function and/or a linear form. Knowing this it is now clear that taking $\dot{\text{res}}$ as a linear form, then for the function of your interest, it holds that $$ res := A_i \widetilde{u} - C\widetilde{v} \quad \in \quad W^{1,2}\left(0,T,H^1(\Omega),H^1(\Omega)^*\right).$$

$$ $$ $$ $$ Please also consider this questions. And the comment about characterizing the norms thorough the Fourier-transform.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.