This question is from Willard's General Topology:
Is there a set of all topological spaces?
My try is: Suppose $\mathfrak T $ is set of all topological spaces, then $\mathfrak T $ 'contains' all the sets (i.e., if $S$ is some set, then $\{\varnothing, S\}\in\mathfrak T $). Since Willard assumes that a set cannot be element of itself (exact words in Willard: Russell's paradox can be avoided (in our naive discussion) by agreeing that no aggregate shall be a set which would be an element of itself.) But, if $\mathfrak T$ is a set, then 'set of all sets' is 'subset' of $\mathfrak T$, counter to our agreement.
I find my argument appealing as well as sloppy at the same time :), :(. Have I done something wrong?