0
$\begingroup$

Two riemann surfaces $S$ and $R$ are said to be conformally equivalent if there exist a holomorphic map $f:S\rightarrow R$ which is one-one and onto, and inverse is also holomorphic.

I have to show No two of them are conformaly equivalent: $a$) $\hat{\mathbb{C}}$, $b$) $\mathbb{C}$, $c$) $D$(Open Unit Disc)

Ok let $f:a\rightarrow b$ be a bijective holomorphic map and $f^{-1}: b\rightarrow a$ is also holomorphic, well,the contracdiction is $f(\hat{\mathbb{C}})=\mathbb{C}$ as $\mathbb{C}$ is non-compact? for $b\rightarrow c$ riemann mapping theorem can be applied to show the contradiction? and $a\rightarrow c$ is same argument as $a\rightarrow b$?

please help me.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ It depends on how you've stated RMT. Note that a map $\mathbb C \to D$ is bounded. Also, note that the open unit disk is not compact. $\endgroup$ – Dylan Moreland Jul 23 '12 at 19:33
  • $\begingroup$ well, every simply connected domain which is not equal to $\mathbb{C}$ is biholomorphic to $D$, This is the statement I know for RMT, and I understand that the map will be bounded and hence by Lioville's Theroem it will be constant. $\endgroup$ – Marso Jul 23 '12 at 19:39
3
$\begingroup$

The sphere is the only compact one, so neither of the other two can be a continuous image of it, so cannot be conformally equivalent to it.

$\mathbb{D}$ cannot be the holomorphic image of $\mathbb{C}$ by Liouville's Theorem. (If it were we would have a bounded non constant entire analytic function).

And we're done!

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.