In your tennis club there are two other members. One of them is a very good player. His name is Roger (think Federer) and you have a 0.1 probability of winning a match against him. The other player is Joe (think average). He is a decent tennis player and you have a 0.4 probability of winning a match against him. In a tennis tournament, you have two choices for the sequence of matches: Roger, Joe, Roger or Joe, Roger, Joe To get a prize in the tournament you need to win at least two matches in a row among your set of three matches. (Note: this does not mean winning two out of three matches; you have to win at least two consecutive matches.)

4a. Which of these two schedules (RJR or JRJ) gives you the better chance at a prize?

4b. What is the expected number of wins for you in the sequence RJR? In the sequence JRJ?

My solution:

For Part A, I just multiplied the probabilities of each comination of 3 that includes two consecutive wins (w,w,l), (l,w,w), (w,w,w). For RJR, this came out to be 0.076. For JRJ I got 0.064.

For Part B, I'm a little stuck. I started calculating the expected number of winning games like so:

For RJR:

0 games won * (0.9*0.6*0.9) = 0

1 game won * (0.1*0.6*0.9 + 0.9*0.4*0.9 + 0.9*0.6+0.1) = 0.432

2 games won * (0.1*0.4*0.9 + 0.9*0.4*0.1 + 0.1*0.6+0.1) = 0.156

3 games won * (0.1*0.4*0.1) = 0.012

0+0.432+0.156+0.012 = 0.6

And the same for the JRJ order. Is this correct though?

  • $\begingroup$ The procedure is ok. I haven't checked the arithmetic. $\endgroup$ – true blue anil Apr 14 '16 at 6:15
  • $\begingroup$ In, for example, your calculation for $3$ games won, you write $(0.1)(0.4)(0.1)=0.12$. Of course this is technically not right, you multiplied by $3$ to get the $0.12$. The procedure was correct but the description was not. $\endgroup$ – André Nicolas Apr 14 '16 at 6:26

Your strategy looks right. Let us check your RJR calculation by using a different method, which I hope is accessible.

Let random variable $X_1$ be equal to $1$ if you win the first game, and $0$ if you lose the first game. Define $X_2$ and $X_3$ analogously. Then the number $Y$ of games won is given by $Y=X_1+X_2+X_3$. By the linearity of expectation we have $E(Y)=E(X_1)+E(X_2)+E(X_3)$.

We have $E(X_1)=E(X_3)=0.1$ and $E(X_2)=0.4$, so $E(Y)=0.6$.

  • $\begingroup$ Thank you! That makes sense $\endgroup$ – dibdub Apr 14 '16 at 6:20
  • $\begingroup$ You are welcome. I hesitated to introduce random variables, since that may be premature. But since your analysis was correct I thought I would add information that will be useful, if not now then later. $\endgroup$ – André Nicolas Apr 14 '16 at 6:28

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.