I know this seems like a dumb question. But I can't see why we need the condition that $X$ is a locally compact Hausdorff space when we define $C_0(X)$. I think many properties still hold without locally compact Hausdorff property. For example,I think $C_0(X)$ is still a $C^*$-algebra for a general topological space $X$, am I right?


You're right; $C_0(X)$ is a $C^*$-algebra for any topological space $X$. However, for any $X$, we can canonically associate to it another space $Y$ which is locally compact Hausdorff such that $C_0(X)\cong C_0(Y)$, so in some sense we lose no generality by restricting $X$ to be locally compact Hausdorff (and most interesting examples are).

To construct $Y$, let $X^*=X\cup\{\infty\}$ be the $1$-point compactification of $X$ (topologized by saying neighborhoods of $\infty$ are cocompact open subsets of $X$); then an element of $C_0(X)$ is equivalent to a continuous map $X^*\to\mathbb{C}$ that vanishes at $\infty$. Now let $p:X^*\to Z$ be the Hausdorffification of $X^*$ (i.e., the quotient of $X^*$ by the smallest equivalence relation such that the quotient is Hausdorff) and let $Y=Z\setminus\{p(\infty)\}$. Then $Y$ is locally compact Hausdorff, since it is an open subset of the compact Hausdorff space $Z$. Since $\mathbb{C}$ is Hausdorff, every continuous map $X^*\to\mathbb{C}$ factors through $Z$. It follows that there is a natural bijection between elements of $C_0(X)$ and continuous functions on $Z$ that vanish at $p(\infty)$. But these functions are the same as elements of $C_0(Y)$, since $Z$ is the one-point compactification of $Y$. It is then easy to check that this bijection $C_0(X)\cong C_0(Y)$ is actually an isomorphism of $C^*$-algebras.

| cite | improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ Wow, amazing! But it will take me some time to digest your solution~~~there are quite a lot of details for me to fill in~~~ $\endgroup$ – No One Apr 10 '16 at 3:09
  • $\begingroup$ Hi, could you correct wikipedia which defines $C^*$ algebras as algebras of endomorphisms on some Hilbert space closed for the norm topology (ie. the norm would be the operator norm of $B(H)$) whereas it seems the common definition is a Banach algebra with an involution compatible with the norm and ($B(H)$ is just the motivating example, together with $C_0(X)$) $\endgroup$ – reuns Jun 9 '19 at 12:06

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.