If $(E,<)$ is a linear order, let $s(E)$ denote the supremum of the set of ordinals which (order-)embed in $(E,<)$. $s(E)$ is also the set of ordinals which embed in $E$ with a non cofinal range.
If $(G,+,0,<)$ is an ordered group, then $s(G)$ is an additive ordinal because given $\alpha < s(G)$ and $f_{\alpha}: \alpha \rightarrow G$ a positive order embeding with strict upper bound $a$, $f_{\alpha.2}:= \{(\alpha.t + \beta,f_{\alpha}(\beta) + t.a) \ | \ (t,\beta) \in 2 \times \alpha\}$ is an order embedding $\alpha.2 \rightarrow G$ with $2.a$ as a strict upper bound.
If $(R,+, \ ,0,1,<)$ is a discrete ordered ring, then $s(A)$ is a multiplicative ordinal because given $\alpha < s(G)$ and $f_{\alpha}: \alpha \rightarrow R$ a positive order embeding with strict upper bound $a$, $f_{{\alpha}^2}:= \{(\alpha.\beta + \delta,af_{\alpha}(\beta) + f_{\alpha}(\delta)) \ | \ \beta,\delta \in \alpha\}$ is an order embedding ${\alpha}^2 \rightarrow R$ with $a^2 + a$ as a strict upper bound.
If $R$ is an ordered ring but $R$ is not discrete, $f_{{\alpha}^2}$ need not be an embedding because two distinct points in the range of $f_{\alpha}$ may be very close to each other.
Is $s(R)$ multiplicative nonetheless whenever $R$ is a ordered ring?