5
$\begingroup$

I am a programmer by trade, and am very interested in fractals.

To be very basic about the concept, one might say a 'circle of circles' is a fractal. Where each circle is made up of circles, and those circles are made of smaller circles and so on.

This idea is similar to a Sierpinski triangle, which I interpret basically a triangle of triangles.

To test my understanding, I decided to draw out this notion of a 'circle of circles'. Realize, I did this by hand with MS paint, copy and paste. I really should have just written out a simple program using some derivative of pi to get a perfect, mathematical display.

In any case, this image is just to illustrate the concept.

enter image description here

It's obviously not perfect, my question is: Is the notion of a 'circle of circles', 'triangle of triangles', or 'function of functions' truly the definition of a fractal? And, consequently, is the application of this notion, in this image, a fractal? (I realize it isn't because the alignment is incorrect.)

Note: The coloring was just so I could see the pattern easier, lets assume there is no color. Though if the color had been also repeating, would this still prove true?

I included another, expanding on the use of color:

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I quite like the picture you've generated :P $\endgroup$ – user2662833 Apr 8 '16 at 5:33
  • $\begingroup$ The inside of the entire circle should technically be purple ;) $\endgroup$ – bigcodeszzer Apr 8 '16 at 6:02
  • $\begingroup$ Or one of the colors actually, depending on which part of the sequence it is zoomed to. $\endgroup$ – bigcodeszzer Apr 8 '16 at 6:05
  • $\begingroup$ Haha agreed, if you're happy with my answer, could you please consider accepting it as the correct answer :) $\endgroup$ – user2662833 Apr 8 '16 at 6:40
  • $\begingroup$ Your set is the attractor of an iterated function system, close to one that generates a 9 fold polygasket. Have a look at this poly-gasket visualization. Set the number of sides to 9 and the scaling ratio to 0.25. You will generate an image very close to yours. $\endgroup$ – Mark McClure Apr 8 '16 at 12:02
1
$\begingroup$

A fractal is just a simple rule that you repeat over and over again. You'd be right to say that it is recursive sometimes, but it isn't always generated recursively, indeed many fractals would be impossible to generate with a recursive "seed" so to speak.

Mandelbrot Set

For example, here is the mandelbrot set:

Mandelbrot Set

You can generate this picture by making a grid on your computer to represent the complex plane, and assigning a single complex number to each grid cell (for example, the origin would be 0+0i and the right-most point would be 1+0i).

After this, you can just run this simple mathematical function say, 50 times (arbitrary choice):

$$z_{n+1} = z_n^2 + c $$

Where c is a constant of your choosing. If after these 50 iterations, the number you've generated is greater than 2; you've "diverged", so you color that pixel white. Else, you've converged, and you color that pixel white. *you'd want $|c| < 1$ for that reason.

You can generated a colored mandelbrot set by coloring the pixel based on the magnitude after 50 iterations.

Your Fractal

Your fractal is certainly a fractal if you continue to iterate it. In fact, to make this fractal, you'd just have a function that you will repeat over and over again, however; the manner in which you generate the fractal may be different. I'd therefore say that a good definition for a fractal is just an object that displays self similarity at different scales, or an object that is produced by repeated applications of a simple rule (which is exactly what you've done).

This extends fractals from the realm of graphics and the physical world into other areas where they may someday find an application :)

Hope that helps.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I thought to be a fractal, the pattern had to the same at every scale. Does the mandelbrot do that? If not, what is the difference? $\endgroup$ – bigcodeszzer Apr 8 '16 at 5:09
  • $\begingroup$ Yes the mandelbrot set definitely does do that :P check this out $\endgroup$ – user2662833 Apr 8 '16 at 5:12
  • $\begingroup$ Oh man, that's really trippy haha. $\endgroup$ – bigcodeszzer Apr 8 '16 at 5:16
  • $\begingroup$ So what makes the 'circle of circles' different from the mandelbrot set? $\endgroup$ – bigcodeszzer Apr 8 '16 at 5:18
  • $\begingroup$ Is the mandelbrot not perfectly recursive? Why/why not? $\endgroup$ – bigcodeszzer Apr 8 '16 at 5:24

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.