In a nutshell: If we start from an immersion, and look at its harmonic decomposition, are the components also immersions?


Let $(M,g)$ be an $n$-dimensional, compact Riemannian manifold with boundary. Assume $f:M \to \mathbb{R}^n$ is an immersion which is not harmonic*. (i.e $df$ is invertible at every point $p \in M$, note I assume $n$ is the dimension of $M$). Let $(\omega,z)$ be the harmonic decomposition of $f$, i.e: $\omega,z:M \to \mathbb{R}^n$ satisfying:

(1) $f=\omega+z$

(2) $\omega$ is harmonic ($\Delta_B\omega^i=0,\text{where } \, \omega^i \, \, \text{ are the components of } \, \,\omega$ and $\Delta_B$ is the Laplace-Beltrami operator)

(3) $\omega|_{\partial M}=f|_{\partial M}$

Is it true $dw$,$dz$ must be invertible?

*Note: If $f$ is harmonic ($f=\omega,z=0$ then of course $dz$ is non-invertible).

Update: As showed by Anthony Carapetis $dz$ can be in general non-invertible on an open subset of $M$. The question whether $d\omega$ can be non-invertible is still open.


Let's take $M$ to be a connected domain in $\mathbb R^n$ and the boundary condition to be the standard immersion $\partial M \to \mathbb R^n$ (so that $\omega$ is the inclusion map $M \to \mathbb R^n$).

Then let $\phi$ be a function $M \to \mathbb R$ vanishing on the boundary satisfying $|\nabla \phi| < 1$ and define the deformation $f(x) = x + \phi(x)e_1$. This has differential $Df(v) = v + D_v\phi\ e_1$, so in particular $|Df(v)| \ge |v|(1 - |D_{v/|v|} \phi|) > 0$; i.e. $f$ is an immersion. Additionally we know $\Delta f = \Delta \phi\ e_1$, so we can even arrange for $f$ to be non-harmonic everywhere on the interior (take $\phi$ to be a small multiple of the first Dirichlet eigenfunction of $\Delta$).

Since $\omega(x) = x$, we get $z(x) = \phi(x) e_1$, which has 1-dimensional image and is clearly not an immersion.

I imagine you can do a similar "bad" deformation starting from any harmonic local diffeomorphism.

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, but I meant for the domain and the codomain to be of the same dimension. (i.e $n$ is the same). I will stress this point better in the phrasing of the question. $\endgroup$ Apr 4 '16 at 10:04
  • $\begingroup$ Actually I now see that I wrote $df$ should be invertible,... so this was implicitly stated in the question $\endgroup$ Apr 4 '16 at 10:07
  • $\begingroup$ @AsafShachar: I believe the mistake was mine - you did state $M$ was $n$-dimensional. Anyway, I've got a new counterexample for you. $\endgroup$ Apr 4 '16 at 10:30
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks (I upvoted:). In your example $\omega$ was an immersion. I am still interested to know whether it's possible for $d \omega$ to be non-invertible (on a set of positive measure). Perhaps you can think of an example where this situation occurs? Thanks again. $\endgroup$ Apr 4 '16 at 16:18
  • $\begingroup$ @AsafShachar: I think $\omega$ will always be an immersion. Try looking for some literature on the Dirichlet problem for harmonic diffeomorphisms. $\endgroup$ Apr 4 '16 at 22:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.