2
$\begingroup$

Let $R$ be a commutative Noetherian ring. Let $M$ be a non-zero $R$-module (not necessary finitely generated). Prove that set of associated primes of the module is not empty, $\mathrm{Ass}_R(M) \neq \emptyset$.

For brevity I will use name $A = \{ \mathrm{Ann}_R(m) | m \in M \bullet m \neq 0 \}$ . It's already was proved that maximal elements of $A$ will be primes in $R$ and hence belong to $\mathrm{Ass}_R(M)$. However I'm struggling showing that $A$ actually has maximal elements. Its possible to establish that for any $m \in M$ such that $m \neq 0$

$$\{0\} \subset\mathrm{Ann}(M) \subset \mathrm{Ann}(m)$$ So $A \neq \emptyset$ and it seems that we can apply Zorn's lemma. However, now we need to show that any ascending chain $C$ in $A$ indexed by strictly ordered set $I$ has an upper bound in $A$. As our ring is Noetherian we can use representation $C_i = (c_i)$ for some indexed family $c_i$ of $n_i$ elements in $R$. We know that for each $i < j$ from $I$ there exists $r \in R^{n_j}$ such that $c_i = r \cdot c_j$ (where $(\cdot)$ represents pointwise multiplication). And I don't know how to apply Noetherian nature of $R$ any further to attain actual upper bound for chain $C$. (I don't know how to prove that $\bigcup_{i \in I}C_i \in A$ ). And I don't know how to use decomposition to irreducable elements as I don't know how to bound growth of $n_i$ .

Maybe I forgot some important properties of Noetherian rings?

Maybe Zorn's lemma is a wrong way to go?

Thanks!

p. s.

It turned out that I forgot about ACC for ideals of Noetherian rings.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Every non-empty set $A$ of ideals in a noetherian ring has a maximal element: Take $I_0 \in A$. If it's not maximal there is $I_1$ in $A$ such that $I_0 \subsetneqq I_1$. If $I_1$ is not a max. element in $A$, there is $I_2$ with $I_0 \subsetneqq I_1\subsetneqq I_2$. Continuing this way you get a strictly ascending chain of ideals which must stop since $R$ is noetherian. By construction the last ideal in the chain is maximal in $A$. $\endgroup$ – Todd Leason Mar 31 '16 at 12:22
  • $\begingroup$ It turned out that I forgot about Ascending chain condition for Noetherian rings. Do you think I should delete the question? $\endgroup$ – Nik Pronko Mar 31 '16 at 12:29
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ No need to delete it. Other people might have the same question and will find your post helpful. $\endgroup$ – Todd Leason Mar 31 '16 at 12:31
0
$\begingroup$

It suffices just to use Ascending chain condition on Ideals: For Noetherian rings we know that for any infinite chain $C$ $$\exists N \in I \; : \; \forall i > N \; . \; C_N = C_i$$ As all elements of $C$ were drown from $A$ ACC also resolves this situation.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.