0
$\begingroup$

Question :

Given that :$\underset{x\rightarrow0^{+}}{\lim}f(x)=L$ and that $g(x)=f(-x)$

Need to prove that $\underset{x\rightarrow0^{-}}{\lim}g(x)$ exists and define it in values of L

My try to answer : From what is given to me $\forall\varepsilon\exists\delta\quad 0<x-0<\delta\rightarrow|f(x)-L|<\epsilon$ And I understand that I need somehow to prove that $\underset{x\rightarrow0^{-}}{\lim}f(-x)\rightarrow-\delta<x-0<0\rightarrow|f(-x)-\tilde{L}|<\epsilon$

However I am stuck with the f(-x) thing, just do not know how to approach it.

Could use some help :)

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Notice that the possible values of $x$ in the second limit are the negative of the possible values of $x$ in the first limit. $\endgroup$ – Noble Mushtak Mar 30 '16 at 19:26
1
$\begingroup$

You are given the following for some $L \in \Bbb{R}$:

$$(\forall\epsilon > 0)(\exists \delta > 0)(\forall x \in \Bbb{R})(0 < x-0 < \delta \implies \lvert f(x)-L \rvert < \epsilon)$$

You want to prove the following:

$$(\forall\epsilon > 0)(\exists \delta > 0)(\forall x \in \Bbb{R})(-\delta < x-0 < 0 \implies \lvert f(-x)-L \rvert < \epsilon)$$

Now, we want to take the inequality $-\delta < x-0 < 0$ and somehow learn something about $-x$ because $-x$ is what's being passed into $f$ in our conclusion. Let's try taking the negative of the inequality (remember to switch inequality signs):

$$\delta > -x > 0 \rightarrow 0 < -x < \delta$$

Now, we can substitute that last inequality into our conclusion to get a logically equivalent statement:

$$(\forall\epsilon > 0)(\exists \delta > 0)(\forall x \in \Bbb{R})(0 < -x < \delta \implies \lvert f(-x)-L \rvert < \epsilon)$$

If you compare this with the conclusion, you'll see that the conclusion is just the given with $-x$ substituted for $x$. Therefore, since the possible set of values for $x$ (which is $\Bbb{R}$) is closed under negation, this statement obviously follows from the given.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for your answer... !! Tried to rely on what was told by you, will this proof work ? Set $-x=z$ $$ \begin{array}{cc} \\ \underset{x\rightarrow0^{+}}{\lim}f(z)=L & \iff\forall\varepsilon>0\exists\delta>0\forall y\in\mathbb{R}\quad0<z<\delta\rightarrow|f(z)-L|<\varepsilon\\ \iff & 0<-x<\delta\rightarrow|f(-x)-L|<\varepsilon\\ \iff & -\delta<x<0\rightarrow|f(-x)-L|<\varepsilon\\ \iff & \underset{x\rightarrow0^{-}}{\lim}f(-x)=L=\underset{x\rightarrow0^{-}}{\lim}g(x) \end{array} $$ $\endgroup$ – Pavel Penshin Mar 30 '16 at 20:53
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Almost. You have to say that $\underset{z \rightarrow 0^+} \lim f(z)=L$ because the variables under the limit and inside the expression should match. Also, $\forall y \in \Bbb{R}$ should actually be $\forall z \in \Bbb{R}$ because you're using $z$, not $y$. Other than those variable changes, you should be good! $\endgroup$ – Noble Mushtak Mar 30 '16 at 21:00

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.