If $X$ is a normal variety, and $p \in X$, is it true that there is a curve $C \subset X$ with $p \in C$ a smooth point (on C)?

It is obviously false if normality is dropped - take $X$ to be a singular curve. I have no specific reason beyond this to request normality, though the examples I am familiar with pass this test. I somewhat doubt that this could be true, so I am asking for a counter example.

(The vague motivation is that I am thinking about the valuative criterion for separatedness recently, and would like to understand the intuition that there are no curves $C$ with double points on a separated scheme - i.e with two centers for the same valuation on $C$. And I like DVRs, though I guess one can just take an arbitrary curve passing through the point and take its normalization to get a discrete valuation on the curves function field with some prescribed center. I am still curious about the geometric question anyway.)

The other side of this question:

Is there a (normal) variety $X$ with a singularity so "bad" that all curves passing through that point acquire that singularity?

  • $\begingroup$ Nice question: +1. $\endgroup$ – Georges Elencwajg Mar 29 '16 at 19:26

Here's an example to show the answer to the first question is "no".

Let $S$ be a surface which is factorial but not smooth. These singularities do exist, but they are rather special --- see the answer of Victor Protsak to this MO question for some details. By definition of "factorial", every Weil divisor, in particular every curve, on $S$ is a Cartier divisor.

Now, it is a general fact that if $X$ is a variety with a singular point $p$, and $D$ an effective Cartier divisor on $X$ passing through $p$, then $D$ is also singular at $p$. The proof is easy: take an affine open set containing $p$ in which $D$ is principal, defined by some regular function $f$ say. Then the Jacobian matrix for the ideal defining $D$ is obtained from the matrix for the ideal defining $X$ by adding one row, so its rank is at most one more.

So let $p$ be a singular point of $S$. By factoriality, any curve $C$ on $S$ is a Cartier divisor, so if $C$ is a curve passing through $p$, then $C$ must be singular at $p$.

Note that this example works not because the singularity is especially "bad", but rather the opposite --- factorial surface singularities are mild. By contrast the surface ordinary double point $xy=z^2$ is not factorial, but here there are smooth curves passing through the singularity. The point is precisely that these smooth curves are Weil divisors that fail to be Cartier.

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks. And the "general fact" about Cartier divisors is quite easy to prove, no? It just follows from the observing that the differential of a local equation cannot drop the dimension of the tangent space by more than one, so the point remains smooth. $\endgroup$ – Lorenzo Najt Mar 28 '16 at 19:24
  • $\begingroup$ @AreaMan: Right. $\endgroup$ – Nefertiti Mar 28 '16 at 20:09
  • $\begingroup$ Could you expand a little on what makes a singularity "mild"? $\endgroup$ – Lorenzo Najt Mar 29 '16 at 4:07
  • $\begingroup$ Dear Pooh Bear, I would be quite grateful to you if you wrote down a reasonably complete proof that a (presumably effective) Cartier divisor passing through a singular point of a scheme is itself singular. $\endgroup$ – Georges Elencwajg Mar 29 '16 at 19:25
  • $\begingroup$ @GeorgesElencwajg: yes, effective, thanks! The proof is just what AreaMan said above. I added some words of explanation in the answer. $\endgroup$ – Nefertiti Mar 30 '16 at 6:43

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.