I have to check the next version of the theorem Frobenius:

Let $M$ a smooth manifold and $\{\omega^1,\ldots,\omega^k\}\subset\Omega^{1}(U)$ $l.i.$ on $U\subset M$ and $P(x)=\{ v\in T_x M\vert \omega^j_x(v)=0$ for $j=1,\ldots,k\}$ then $P$ is completely integrable iff for all $j=1,\ldots,k$ $$d\omega^j\wedge \omega^1\wedge\dots\wedge \omega^k=0.$$ According to my exercise should I try this result by the following steps:

  1. $P(x)$ is a subspace of codimension $k$ of $T_x M$ and $P$ is a $\mathcal{C}^{r}$-distribution.

  2. We can complete a basis of $(T_x M)^\ast$ with $\{\omega^1,\ldots,\omega^k\}\subset\Omega^{1}(V)$ ($V\subset U$). If $\eta\in \Omega^{2}(U)$ such that $\eta\wedge \omega^1\wedge\dots\wedge \omega^k=0$ then $$\eta=\sum_{1\leq i<j\leq k}\alpha_{ij} \omega^i\wedge\omega^j$$

  3. For $\omega\in \Omega^1(U)$, $X,Y$ vector fields we have: $$d\omega(X,Y)=d\omega(X)(Y)-d\omega(Y)(X)-\omega[X,Y]$$

  4. If $X,Y$ vector fields on $P$ and $d\omega^j\wedge \omega^1\wedge\dots\wedge \omega^k=0$ for all $j=1,\ldots,k$ then $[X,Y]\in P$.

5.If $P$ is involutive then $d\omega^j\wedge \omega^1\wedge\dots\wedge \omega^k=0$ for all $j=1,\ldots,k$.

I have already the first four steps but I dont know how to prove the last one


Choose vector fields on $U$ with $X_1,...,X_{k}$ spanning $P$ complement and $X_{k+1},...,X_{k+n}$ spanning $P$ at each point.

You can use this formula for the wedge of two forms (set $\eta=\omega^1\wedge...\wedge\omega^k$):

$d\omega^j\wedge\eta(v_1,...,v_{2+k})=\sum_{\sigma\in S_{2,k}} \text{sgn}(\sigma)d\omega^j(v_{\sigma(1)}, v_{\sigma(2)})\eta(v_{\sigma(3)},...,v_{\sigma(k+2)})$

to get that the form vanishes by showing that each term in the sum vanishes when applied to any $k+2$ vectors from the frame.

This is just because $\iota_{X}\eta=0$ for any $X\in P$ and since $P$ is involutive $d\omega^j(X,Y)=0$ for any $X,Y\in P$ by your (3).

For example $d\omega^j\wedge\eta(X_1,...,X_{k+2})=0$ since each term of the sum with $X_{k+1}$ or $X_{k+2}$ plugged into $\eta$ is zero and the remaining terms of the sum with $X_{k+1}, X_{k+2}$ plugged into $d\omega^j$ are zero.

| cite | improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.