1
$\begingroup$

problem 5.5.54 - For any nonempty set $A$, $l^{2}(A)$ is complete.

Attempted proof (inspired by the answer below): Let $x\in A$, and $\{T_n(x)\}_{n\in\mathbb{N}}$ be a Cauchy sequence in $l^{2}(A)$. This means for $\epsilon = \frac{1}{k}$ we can find an $n_k(\epsilon)\in\mathbb{N}$ for $k\in\mathbb{N}$ such that $$|T_n(x) - T_m(x)|\leq \lVert T_n - T_m\lVert \leq \frac{1}{k} \ \ \forall \ n,m \geq n_k(\epsilon)$$

Take $S\subset A$, where $S$ is finite, for $x\in S$ it follows $$\sum_{x\in S}|T_{n_k}(x) - T(x)|^2 = \lim_{m\rightarrow \infty}\sum_{x\in S}|T_{n_k}(x) - T_m(x)|^2 \leq \left(\limsup\lVert T_{n_k} - T_m\rVert\right)^{2} \leq \frac{1}{k^2} $$ Thus, $$\lVert T_{n_k} - T\rVert \leq \lim\sup \lVert T_{n_k} - T_m\rVert \leq \frac{1}{k}$$ And, $T = T_{n_1} - (T_{n_1} - T)\in l^{2}(A)$

I am not exactly sure this is correct, any suggestions is greatly appreciated.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Where is the confusion? $l^2$ is a normed space, the definition of Cauchy sequence is straight forward. Where do you stuck at proving that every Cauchy sequence converges? Btw. it is the same proof for every $L^p$ space, $1\le p < \infty$. $\endgroup$ – user251257 Mar 26 '16 at 19:26
  • $\begingroup$ I see, so if I show the $T_n$ $n\in\mathbb{N}$ is a Cauchy sequence in $l^2(A)$ I am done? $\endgroup$ – Wolfy Mar 26 '16 at 19:30
  • $\begingroup$ No, $T_n$ is a Cauchy sequence in $l^2$. Then, you have to show that there is a $T\in l^2$ such that $T_n\to T$ in $l^2$. Hint: To obtain $T$, use the fact that $T_n$ is Cauchy and show it has one convergent subsequence (Cauchy sequence has one limit point at most). $\endgroup$ – user251257 Mar 26 '16 at 19:33
  • $\begingroup$ Ok sorry I should of re-edited my comment I meant that if I let $T_n$ $n\in\mathbb{N}$ be a Cauchy sequence in $l^2$ and I show that $T_n\rightarrow T\in l^2$ then I am done? $\endgroup$ – Wolfy Mar 26 '16 at 19:35
  • $\begingroup$ Yes. You need to construct $T$ explicitly. $\endgroup$ – user251257 Mar 26 '16 at 19:36
1
$\begingroup$

The case $l^2(A)$:

  1. For every $x\in A$ we have $|T_l(x) - T_m(x)| \le \|T_l - T_m\|$. Thus, $(T_n(x))_{n\in \mathbb N}$ is Cauchy and has a limit $T(x)\in\mathbb R$.

  2. Now, for every $k\in\mathbb N$ let $n_k\in\mathbb N$ such that for every $l,m\ge n_k$ it follows $\|T_l - T_m \| \le 1/k$. For every finite subset $S\subset A$ we have $$ \sum_{x\in S} |T_{n_k}(x) - T(x)|^2 = \lim_{m\to\infty}\sum_{x\in S} |T_{n_k}(x) - T_m(x)|^2 \le \left( \limsup_{m\to\infty} \|T_{n_k} - T_m\| \right)^2 \le \frac1{k^2}.$$ Thus $$ \| T_{n_k} - T \| \le \limsup_{m\to\infty} \|T_{n_k} - T_m\| \le \frac1{k} \to 0. $$

  3. In particular, we have $T_{n_1} - T\in l^2(A)$ and $T= T_{n_1} - (T_{n_1} - T) \in l^2(A)$.

    Further, as a Cauchy sequence has at most a cluster point, the cluster point $T$ is also the limit of the Cauchy sequence $(T_n)_{n\in\mathbb N}$.

The proof of Riesz-Fischer theorem on arbitrary measure space:

  1. For every $k\in\mathbb N$ there is some $n_k\in\mathbb N$ such that for every $l,m\ge n_k$ it follows $\| T_l - T_m \| < 2^{-k}$ .

  2. It is sufficient to show that the subsequence $T_{n_k}$ converges in $l^2$. Wlog let that subsequence be the complete sequence, that is $$ \| T_{n+k} - T_n \| < 2^{-n} $$ for every $n,k\in\mathbb N$.

  3. Let $S_n = \sum_{k=1}^n |T_{k+1} - T_k|$ (pointwise absolute value). Using Monotone Convergence/Fatou's lemma to obtain $$ \int_A \lim_{n\to\infty} S_n^2 = \lim_{n\to\infty} \int_A S_n^2 = \left(\lim_{n\to\infty} \|S_n\| \right)^2 \le \left( \sum_{n=1}^\infty \| T_{n+1} - T_n \| \right)^2 \le 1. $$

  4. Thus, for almost every $x\in A$ the limit $\lim_{n\to\infty} S_n(x)$ exists and $(T_n(x))_{n\in\mathbb N}$ is a Cauchy sequence. Thus, there exists some $T:A\to\mathbb R$ such $T_n\to T$ pointwise a.e.

  5. Using Fatou's lemma, we obtain $$\int_A |T - T_n|^2 \le \liminf_{k\to\infty} \int_A |T_k - T_n|^2 = \left( \liminf_{k\to\infty} \|T_k - T_n\| \right)^2 \le (2^{-n})^2 \to 0$$ for $n\to\infty$.

Notes:

  • The theorem is called / due to Riesz-Fischer

  • If you replace the 2's with $p \in [1,\infty)$, you obtain that $L^p$ is complete.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I am trying to incorporate these points in my proof. But I having some trouble. Do you think my set-up to start is ok? $\endgroup$ – Wolfy Mar 26 '16 at 21:26
  • $\begingroup$ @Wolfgang: I add the version for counting measure, without convergence theorems. It is a little bit easier. $\endgroup$ – user251257 Mar 26 '16 at 21:27
  • $\begingroup$ I see that now, for 1 though I am confused a tad after when you say "For every $x\in A$ we have...". Why is that the case? Can't one just start with assuming we have a Cauchy sequence like I did in the above? $\endgroup$ – Wolfy Mar 26 '16 at 21:29
  • $\begingroup$ @Wolfgang: I did and I use the fact that $T_n$ is Cauchy at many places. Like I said before, you have to explicitly construct a limit, here $T$. $\endgroup$ – user251257 Mar 26 '16 at 21:31
  • $\begingroup$ Ok, I will attempt that and re-post my proof shortly $\endgroup$ – Wolfy Mar 26 '16 at 21:32

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.