Let $X=\{0,1\}^{\mathbb{N}}$, $T:X\to X$ the shift map, and $\mu$ a $T$-invariant probability measure on $X$. A point $x \in X$ is generic if $$ \lim\, \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i<n} \chi_{\sigma}(T^{i}(x)) $$ exists for every finite binary string $\sigma$ (so $\chi_{\sigma}$ is the characteristic function of the basic clopen cylinder set determined by $\sigma$). By Birkhoff's ergodic theorem, $\mu$-almost all $x$ are generic. Now when $x$ is generic, the set function $\mu_{x}$ defined on basic clopen cylinders by $$ \mu_{x}(\sigma) = \lim\, \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i<n} \chi_{\sigma}(T^{i}(x)) $$ is actually (extendable to) a $T$-invariant measure. This page claims that this measure is in fact ergodic.

Question: Why is $\mu_{x}$ ergodic when $x$ is generic?


$x$ can be generic by your definition while $\mu_x$ is not ergodic:

A generic point for a non-ergodic measure

The page you linked is only considering points that are generic for ergodic measures.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.