Let the random variables $X$ and $Y$ have a joint PDF which is uniform over the triangle with vertices at $(0, 0), (0, 1 )$ and $(1, 0)$.

  1. Find the joint PDF of $X$ and $Y$.

So apparently the answer is $2$. And it's related with the area of this triangle that easily we can see is $1/2$. How do we get that answer? I guess I don't understand the meaning of joint PDF. Could someone explain that to me too?

  • $\begingroup$ Just to clarify, what do you mean by the answer is 2? 2 isn't a PDF, a PDF is a function. $\endgroup$ – EHH Mar 18 '16 at 16:52
  • $\begingroup$ @EHH I know. I just wanted to be brief. I meant it's 2 in the interval where X and Y is defined and 0 otherwise. $\endgroup$ – Manuel Mar 18 '16 at 17:48

The random variable $(X,Y)$ is uniformly distributed over the region, lets call it $R$, i.e. the pdf $f_{X,Y}(x,y) = k$ for some constant on the region. Now lets integrate over the region

$$\int\int_R f_{X,Y}(x,y)dxdy = \int\int_R k \:dxdy$$

$$\int\int_R f_{X,Y}(x,y)dxdy = k * area(R)$$

$$\int\int_R f_{X,Y}(x,y)dxdy = k * \frac{1}{2}$$

We also know that

$$\int\int_R f_{X,Y}(x,y)dxdy = 1$$


$$k * \frac{1}{2} = 1 \Rightarrow k = 2 $$

And we end up with this pdf:

$$f_{X,Y}(x,y) = \begin{cases} 2, & (x,y) \in R \\ 0, & \text{otherwise} \end{cases} $$

| cite | improve this answer | |

Firstly you need to determine the support $S$ of the random vector $(X,Y)$ $$S=\{(x,y)\in \Bbb R^2: 0\le x\le 1, \; 0\le y\le 1-x\}$$ You should draw a picture (is the only way to solve exercises with two random variables) of this domain. Now, since $(X,Y)$ has uniform distribution, you know that $$f(x,y)=c$$ for some constant $c$ over the support $S$. Two ways to proceed. The first is indeed to observe that the area of this triangle is equal to $1/2$, the other which is more systematic, but does not make use of the special structure of this problem, is to solve $$1=\int_{X}\int_Yf_{XY}(x,y)dydx=\int_{0}^1\int_{0}^{1-x}c\;dydx=c\int_0^11-x\;dx=c\cdot\frac12 \implies c=2$$

| cite | improve this answer | |
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Hello. Thanks for the answer. Is there a reason why we integrate w.r.t. $y$ first and not $x$? $\endgroup$ – Seankala Nov 20 '18 at 4:28
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Sean The reason is because he range of $y$ depends on $x$ whereas the range of $x$ does not depend on $y$. We could of course rewrite the ranges of $x,y$ and integrate w.r.t. $x$ and then for $y$ but why do that? $\endgroup$ – Jimmy R. Nov 20 '18 at 4:32
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Thanks for the response. Sorry, but just for clarification, does this mean that we integrate w.r.t. the dependent variable first? $\endgroup$ – Seankala Nov 20 '18 at 5:14
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Sean Yes, exactly! $\endgroup$ – Jimmy R. Nov 20 '18 at 5:20
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Sean You are welcome and sorry for not being more clear from the beginning. You practically answered this by yourself! $\endgroup$ – Jimmy R. Nov 20 '18 at 5:28

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.