0
$\begingroup$

I am solving a differential equation related to fluid mechanics, a rigid air bubble rising towards the surface of a liquid. Doing all the calculations, I have come to this differential equation, which I have not been able to solve, by far.

$$\frac{d^2y}{dt^2}=A(P_{atm}-\rho g y)^{2/3}\cdot \left(\frac{dy}{dt}\right)^2+By+C \tag{1}$$ Where $A,B,C, P_{atm}, \rho$ and $g$ are all constants.

I have created an alternative differential equation by substituting $v=y'$, as it seems like a legitimate method, however I am not sure how I will solve this, as this equation also seems unsolvable:

$$v\frac{dv}{dy}=A(P_{atm}-\rho g y)^{2/3}\cdot v^2+By+C$$

$$\frac{dv}{dy}=A(P_{atm}-\rho g y)^{2/3}\cdot v+\frac{By+C}{v}\ \tag{2}$$

In conclusion, I would like some guidance to obtain a solution for $y(t)$. I am not sure whether if I solved $(2)$, if it would still be possible to get $y(t)$ from $v(y)$.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

The idea to substitute $v = \frac{\text{d} y}{\text{d} t}$ is a good one. To start with your last equation, we can multiply on both sides with $v$ to obtain \begin{equation} v \frac{\text{d} v}{\text{d} y} = A (P- \rho g\, y)^{\frac{2}{3}} v^2 + B y + C. \tag{1} \end{equation} Now, we recognise the left hand side as the derivative of $\frac{1}{2} v^2$. Therefore, writing $w = v^2$, we can write $(1)$ in terms of $w$ as \begin{equation} \frac{\text{d} w}{\text{d} y} = 2A (P- \rho g\, y)^{\frac{2}{3}} w + 2B y + 2C, \tag{2} \end{equation} which is a linear first order ODE for $w$. Now, I would suggest that you rescale $w$ and $y$ to simplify $(2)$ a bit. A good choice would be to introduce \begin{equation} \eta = \frac{P - \rho g y}{(\frac{\rho g}{2A})^{\frac{3}{5}}} \;\Leftrightarrow \; y = \frac{P - (\frac{\rho g}{2A})^{\frac{3}{5}}\eta}{\rho g} \end{equation} and \begin{equation} z = \frac{\rho g A}{B} (\frac{2A}{\rho g})^{\frac{1}{5}} w\;\Leftrightarrow\;w = \frac{B}{\rho g A} (\frac{\rho g}{2A})^{\frac{1}{5}} z \end{equation} to reduce $(2)$ to \begin{equation} \frac{\text{d} z}{\text{d} \eta} = - \eta^{\frac{2}{3}} z + \eta - D, \tag{3} \end{equation} where \begin{equation} D = \frac{B P +C \rho g}{B (\frac{\rho g}{2A})^{\frac{3}{5}}}. \end{equation} You can solve $(3)$ explicitly in terms of the exponential integral.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for the effort. Would this mean that I would have to find an integrating factor, and get something approximately looking like the Exponential integral? $\endgroup$ – projectilemotion Mar 16 '16 at 23:08
  • $\begingroup$ Well, this being a linear first order differential equation, finding an integrating factor is equivalent to solving the homogeneous ODE $z' = -\eta^{\frac{2}{3}} \$. You can then find the solution to the original, inhomogeneous ODE using variation of parameters. Standard stuff, in a way: see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… . $\endgroup$ – Frits Veerman Mar 17 '16 at 9:25
  • $\begingroup$ The variation of parameters method seemed to work. One question - Where did you get the substitutions \eta and z from, how did you get the 1/5 and 3/5 powers? $\endgroup$ – projectilemotion Mar 17 '16 at 17:02
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Well, I tried linear rescalings of $y$ and $w$, so $y \to \alpha y + \beta$ and $w \to \gamma w + \delta$. It seemed useful to call the quantity within brackets '$\eta$', but then I realised that actually, using the substitution $\eta = \alpha (P - \rho g y)$ allows you to choose $\alpha$ conveniently such that a lot of parameters are scaled away. Same story with $w$: it didn't seem useful to introduce an offset $\delta$, so I just substituted $z = \gamma w$ and chose $\gamma$ such that as many prefactors as possible became 1. $\endgroup$ – Frits Veerman Mar 17 '16 at 17:48

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.