There are many well-known problems and results concerning automorphism groups of fields. For example, it is well-known that the automorphism group of each field in $\{ \mathbb{Q}, \mathbb{F}_{p}, \mathbb{R} \}$ is trivial, and it is well-known that the (known) constructions of the 'wild' automorphisms of the field $\mathbb{C}$ require the axiom of choice (or Zorn's lemma).

It thus seems natural to consider the 'easier' problem of evaluating the group $\text{Aut}(\mathbb{F}^{\ast})$ of group automorphisms of the underlying multiplicative group $\mathbb{F}^{\ast}$ of $\mathbb{F}$.

It is clear that the problem of evaluating $\text{Aut}(\mathbb{F}_{p}^{\ast})$ reduces to the closed problem of evaluating the automorphism group of a finite abelian group (see Automorphisms of Finite Abelian Groups), and it is clear that evaluating $\text{Aut}(\mathbb{Q}^{\ast})$ reduces to the problem of evaluating the group of group automorphisms of $C_{2} \oplus \mathbb{Z} \oplus \mathbb{Z} \oplus \cdots$ (see this related discussion). It thus seems natural to ask:

(1) What is $\text{Aut}\left(\mathbb{R}^{\ast}\right)$?

(2) What is $\text{Aut}\left(\mathbb{C}^{\ast}\right)$?

(3) What is $\text{Aut}\left(\mathbb{C}(t)^{\ast}\right)$?

(4) What is $\text{Aut}\left(\mathbb{Q}_{p}^{\ast}\right)$, where $\mathbb{Q}_{p}$ denotes the field of $p$-adic numbers?

(5) More generally, given a field $\mathbb{F}$, is there a known way of evaluating $\mathbb{F}^{\ast}$?

  • 5
    $\begingroup$ For $(1)$, the group $\mathbb{R}^*$ is isomorphic (through exponential) to the additive group $\mathbb{R}$, so the automorphisms of $\mathbb{R}^*$ are the $\mathbb{Q}$-linear automorphisms of $\mathbb{R}$ (so the group is determined by the $\mathbb{Q}$-dmiension of $\mathbb{R}$, which I guess may depend on the generalized continuum hypothesis or something like that). $\endgroup$ – Captain Lama Mar 16 '16 at 17:04
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ You're working too hard for the case of finite fields: $\mathbb{F}_p^{\times}$ is cyclic of order $p - 1$, so it's much easier to compute its automorphism group than it would be for a general finite abelian group. Its automorphism group is the group of units of $\mathbb{Z}/(p-1)\mathbb{Z}$. $\endgroup$ – Qiaochu Yuan Mar 21 '16 at 17:13

Before you ask what the automorphism groups of these groups are it's probably a good idea to figure out what these groups themselves are. This is not so bad:

  1. $\mathbb{R}^{\times} \cong C_2 \oplus \mathbb{R}$. This comes from looking at the exponential map from $\mathbb{R}$: the $C_2$ factor is $\pm 1$.

  2. $\mathbb{C}^{\times} \cong S^1 \oplus \mathbb{R}$. This comes from looking at the exponential map from $\mathbb{C}$.

  3. $\mathbb{C}(t)^{\times} \cong S^1 \oplus \mathbb{R} \oplus \bigoplus_{\mathbb{C}} \mathbb{Z}$. This comes from looking at constant terms + unique factorization.

  4. $\mathbb{Q}_p^{\times} \cong C_{p-1} \oplus \mathbb{Z}_p \oplus \mathbb{Z}$. The last term is powers of $p$, the first term is looking at constant terms, and the second term comes from the "exponential" map $n \mapsto (1 + p)^n$ from $\mathbb{Z}_p$.

All of these groups have the pleasant property that they split up as a direct sum of torsion and torsion-free parts (although that isn't necessarily the decomposition I wrote above). Whenever an abelian group $A \cong T \oplus F$ has this property, we can write its automorphism group in matrix form as

$$\text{Aut}(A) \cong \text{Aut}(T \oplus F) \cong \left[ \begin{array}{cc} \text{Aut}(T) & \text{Hom}(F, T) \\ 0 & \text{Aut}(F) \end{array} \right].$$

The point is that there can't be any nontrivial homomorphisms $T \to F$, so every endomorphism has this upper triangular form, and then it's an automorphism iff its diagonal components are. This works more generally whenever we can write an abelian group as a direct sum of two subgroups one of which admits no nontrivial homomorphisms to the other. Now let's compute automorphism groups.

Below it will be very convenient to write $I$ to denote the index set of a basis of $\mathbb{R}$ as a $\mathbb{Q}$-vector space (we need AC for this). Occasionally I will pretend this is also a basis of something like $\mathbb{R} \oplus \mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Q}$ since (again assuming AC) these have the same dimension.

  1. $\text{Aut}(C_2)$ is trivial, and there aren't any homomorphisms $\mathbb{R} \to C_2$, so we get $\text{Aut}(\mathbb{R})$, the group of automorphisms of an uncountable dimensional $\mathbb{Q}$-vector space. Assuming AC this is some huge group $GL_I(\mathbb{Q})$ of matrices over $\mathbb{Q}$.

  2. Write $\mathbb{R} \cong \mathbb{Q} \oplus \mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Q}$ (both are just $\mathbb{Q}$-vector spaces). Applying the exponential $\exp (ix)$ gives $S^1 \cong \mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z} \oplus \mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Q}$, so $\mathbb{C}^{\times}$ is $\mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z}$ plus another uncountable dimensional $\mathbb{Q}$-vector space which I will pretend is isomorphic to $\mathbb{R}$ for ease of notation, although I need AC for this. $\text{Aut}(\mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z})$ turns out to be the group of units of the profinite integers $\widehat{\mathbb{Z}}^{\times} \cong \prod_p \mathbb{Z}_p^{\times}$, and there are lots of homomorphisms from a $\mathbb{Q}$-vector space to $\mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z}$. Altogether we get

$$\left[ \begin{array}{cc} \widehat{\mathbb{Z}}^{\times} & \prod_I \text{Hom}(\mathbb{Q}, \mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z}) \\ 0 & GL_I(\mathbb{Q}) \end{array} \right].$$

  1. Now in addition to the issues that arose in 2 we also need to figure out the automorphism group of $\mathbb{R}$ plus uncountably many copies of $\mathbb{Z}$. There are no nontrivial homomorphisms from $\mathbb{R}$ to any sum of copies of $\mathbb{Z}$, so this again has an upper triangular form, involving $\text{Aut}(\mathbb{R})$ (big matrices over $\mathbb{Q}$), $\text{Aut}(\bigoplus_{\mathbb{C}} \mathbb{Z})$ (big matrices over $\mathbb{Z})$, and homomorphisms from $\bigoplus_{\mathbb{C}} \mathbb{Z}$ to $\mathbb{R}$, of which there are again a lot. Altogether we get

$$\left[ \begin{array}{cc} \widehat{\mathbb{Z}}^{\times} & \prod_I \text{Hom}(\mathbb{Q}, \mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z}) & \prod_{\mathbb{C}} \mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z} \\ 0 & GL_I(\mathbb{Q}) & \prod_{\mathbb{C}} \mathbb{R} \\ 0 & 0 & GL_{\mathbb{C}}(\mathbb{Z}) \end{array} \right]$$

  1. Now we need to figure out the automorphism group of $\mathbb{Z}_p \oplus \mathbb{Z}$. At this point I have to confess: I just don't know what this is. I know what the automorphisms of $\mathbb{Z}_p$ are as a profinite group, but not as an abstract group. And I don't know what the homomorphisms $\mathbb{Z}_p \to \mathbb{Z}$, again as abstract groups, are.
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Ack, okay, so above I previously assumed that $\text{Hom}(\mathbb{Q}, \mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z}) \cong \mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z}$ but in fact this group is bigger and weirder: it's the Pontryagin dual of $\mathbb{Q}$ (math.stackexchange.com/questions/48170/…). $\endgroup$ – Qiaochu Yuan Mar 26 '16 at 4:58

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.