1
$\begingroup$

Show $\phi$ is a isomorphism as a lie algebra homomorphism

$\phi: \textbf{su}_2 \bigotimes_{\mathbb{R}} \mathbb{C}\rightarrow sl_2(\mathbb{C})$ and $\phi: a(I \bigotimes 1)+b(J \bigotimes 1)+c(K \bigotimes 1) \rightarrow (ai+b)X+(ai-b)Y+ciH$


Where {$I, J, K$} is a basis of $\textbf{su}_2$ and $a, b, c \in \mathbb{C}$ and {$X, Y, H$} is a basis of $\textbf{sl}_2\mathbb{C}$


$\textbf{What I know:}$ Requirements for $\phi$ to be a lie-algebra isomorphism:

  • lie-bracket must be preserved $\phi([X,Y])=[\phi(X), \phi(Y)]$
  • $\phi$ must be 1:1 and onto
  • I believe that since $\phi$ is a lie algebra homomorphism, then we must just show $\phi$ is a vector-space isomorphism

My problem is I can't apply these facts to the given map; I just can't get my head around it. Any thanks would be very much appreciated

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ You are not taking any basis here, you are taking the canonical generators. $\endgroup$ – Captain Lama Mar 16 '16 at 1:11
  • $\begingroup$ @CaptainLama could you explain canonical generators please? $\endgroup$ – thinker Mar 16 '16 at 1:14
  • $\begingroup$ Are $I$, $J$, $K$, $X$, $Y$ and $H$ not explicited in your exercise ? $\endgroup$ – Captain Lama Mar 16 '16 at 1:16
  • $\begingroup$ @CaptainLama no, they are not explicitly given $\endgroup$ – thinker Mar 16 '16 at 1:21
  • $\begingroup$ They are probably somewhere in the book ; otherwise, your result can't be true (you can't just take any basis...). Most likely, $X$, $Y$ and $H$ are what is called $e$, $f$ and $h$ here en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_linear_Lie_algebra and $I$, $J$ and $K$ are what is called $u_1$, $u_2$ and $u_3$ here en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_unitary_group#n_.3D_2 $\endgroup$ – Captain Lama Mar 16 '16 at 1:31
0
$\begingroup$

$\phi $ is indeed a vector space isomorphism as it takes $\{(I\otimes1) +i(J\otimes1) \space ,(I\otimes1) -i(J\otimes1)\space , (K\otimes1)\}$ to $\{2iX\space,2iY \space ,iH\}$ which is a basis(!) of $\mathfrak{sl}_2(\mathbb{C})$. So $\phi \\ $ is onto and since dimensions are same on both sides, $\phi$ is 1-1 also.

Now the bracket in $\mathfrak{su}_2 \otimes_\mathbb{R}\mathbb{C}$ is given on typical generators by $ [ M\otimes x\space,N\otimes y ] =[M\space,N] \otimes xy$ and $\phi $ is not actually a Lie algebra homomorphism when your $I,J,K,X,Y,H $ are given by your comment for the following reason. $\hspace{30cm}$ We can check that $\phi(I\otimes1)=iX+iY,\phi(J\otimes1)=X-Y,\phi (K\otimes1)=iH,[I,J]=2K$ . $\hspace{30cm}$Now $ \phi[I\otimes1\space ,J\otimes1]=\phi([I,J]\otimes1)=\phi(2K\otimes1)=2\phi(K\otimes1)=2iH$ $\hspace{30cm}$ But$[\phi(I\otimes1),\phi(J\otimes1)]=[iX+iY,X-Y]=2i[Y,X]=-2iH \neq 2iH$ $\hspace{30cm}$ Now if you replace $J\space$ by $-J$ one can easily check(on generators) in a similar fashion as above that $\phi$ is indeed a Lie algebra homo(iso)morphism.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.