3
$\begingroup$

Given the line element $$ds^2 = e^v dt^2 - e^{\lambda} dr^2 - r^2 d \theta^2 - r^2 \sin^2 \theta d \phi^2$$

we wish to compute the Christoffel symbols $\Gamma^{a}_{bc}$ using the geodesic equation.

Our Lagrangian is $$L = g_{ab} {\dot{x}}^a {\dot{x}}^b = e^v \dot{t}^2 - e^{\lambda} \dot{r}^2 - r^2 \dot{\theta}^2 - r^2 \sin^2 \theta \dot{\phi}^2.$$ Applying the Euler-Lagrange equations and dividing by $-2e^v$ yields $$\ddot{t} - \frac{1}{2} \dot{v} \dot{t}^2 + v' \dot{t} \dot{r} + \frac{1}{2} \dot{\lambda} e^{\lambda - v} \dot{r}^2 = 0.$$

I incorrectly conclude that $\Gamma^{0}_{00} = - \frac{1}{2} \dot{v}$. Why? I have a feeling this has something to do with the difference between the geodesic equations for space-like and time-like geodesics.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ $v$ and $\lambda$ are functions of what, exactly? The equations are the same, independently of the geodesic's causal type. $\endgroup$ – Ivo Terek Mar 12 '16 at 16:28
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ They are both functions of $t$ and $r$. $\endgroup$ – Andrew Whelan Mar 12 '16 at 17:26
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Is the correct result $\Gamma_{00}^0 = \frac{1}{2}\dot{v}$? I did the computations here and I got $\Gamma_{00}^0 = \frac{1}{2}\dot{v}$. I think you probably messed up a sign. Also, I assume that you're using the dot at the same time in $v$ and $\lambda$ to denote derivatives wrt to $t$, and the dot in $t$ and $r$ to denote derivative wrt to the parameter of the curve. It is easy to get something wrong like this. If you can check that the result I got is okay, I'll put my calculations in an answer here. $\endgroup$ – Ivo Terek Mar 12 '16 at 23:16
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, that is correct. Would be great to see your calculation $\endgroup$ – Andrew Whelan Mar 12 '16 at 23:47
  • $\begingroup$ Ok. I'm on it. ${}{}$ $\endgroup$ – Ivo Terek Mar 12 '16 at 23:48
1
$\begingroup$

Let $\xi$ be the parameter of the geodesic. I'll introduce a factor of $\frac{1}{2}$ in your Lagrangian for psychological reasons. Then my Lagrangian will be $$L = \frac{1}{2}\left(e^{v(t(\xi),r(\xi))}t'(\xi)^2 - e^{\lambda(t(\xi),r(\xi))}r'(\xi)^2 - r(\xi)^2\theta'(\xi)^2 - r(\xi)^2\sin^2\theta(\xi)\phi'(\xi)^2\right),$$where $\xi$ is the parameter of the curve. From here on I'll drop the point of application - I just wrote everything so we can keep track of chain rules. I won't use dot notation to avoid any confusion, and prime will denote derivatives in $\xi$. We compute the Euler-Lagrange equation $$\frac{\partial L}{\partial t}-\frac{{\rm d}}{{\rm d}\xi}\left(\frac{\partial L}{\partial t'}\right)=0$$First step: $$\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\partial v}{\partial t}e^v t'^2 - \frac{\partial \lambda}{\partial t}e^\lambda r'^2\right)-\frac{{\rm d}}{{\rm d}\xi}\left(e^vt'\right)=0.$$Now: $$\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial v}{\partial t}e^vt'^2 - \frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial \lambda}{\partial t}e^\lambda r'^2 - t'e^v\left(t'\frac{\partial v}{\partial t}+r'\frac{\partial v}{\partial r}\right)-e^vt'' = 0$$ Dividing out $e^v$, writing $t''$ first and distributing: $$-t''+\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial v}{\partial t}t'^2 - \frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial \lambda}{\partial t}e^{\lambda-v} r'^2 - \frac{\partial v}{\partial t}t'^2-\frac{\partial v}{\partial r}t'r'= 0$$

Adding the terms with $t'^2$ and multiplying everything by $-1$ gives: $$t''+\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial v}{\partial t}t'^2 + \frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial \lambda}{\partial t}e^{\lambda-v} r'^2 +\frac{\partial v}{\partial r}t'r'= 0.$$So we conclude that $$\Gamma^0_{00} = \frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial v}{\partial t}, \quad \Gamma^0_{11} = \frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial \lambda}{\partial t}e^{\lambda -v}, \quad \Gamma_{01}^1 = \frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial v}{\partial r}.$$

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.