# Is the fact true that compact set is in perfect set?

By definition,

Perfect set $E_1$ is closed set without isolated points.

Compact set $E_2$ is bounded and closed set in Euclidean space; $\mathbb{R}^n$.

Is the following equation true? $$E_2 \subseteq E_1$$

In my understanding, examples of perfect set; $$\mathbb{R}^n, [10, \infty), [-10, 20] \cup [30, 40], \mbox{Cantor set}, [(0,0) (20, \infty)], \cdots$$

and examples of compact set; $$[10, 20], [-7, -2]\cup[0, 5], [(10, 20), (15, 23)], \cdots$$

In a nutshell, my question is whether every compact set is perfect.

In addition, are there any problems in my examples?

If $p\in\Bbb R^n$, the set $\{p\}$ is compact but not perfect, since $p$ is an isolated point. The same is true of any finite set. There are also infinite compact sets that are not perfect; a simple example in $\Bbb R$ is $\{0\}\cup\left\{\frac1n:n\in\Bbb Z^+\right\}$, in which $0$ is the only non-isolated point.
• In my opinion, $\left\{\cdots, -\frac{1}{2}, -1, 0, 1, \frac{1}{2}, \cdots\right\}$ is not closed and not bounded. So this set is not compact by the Heine-Borel theorem, isn't it? Mar 12 '16 at 6:09
• @Danny: It’s more complicated than that. Take a look at my answer to this question, The diagram shows a compact set in $\Bbb R^2$. If you remove the isolated points, you have another compact set in $\Bbb R^2$, but it still has isolated points. Do this two more times, and you end up with a one-point space. What is true is that every compact set either is countable or has a perfect subset. Mar 12 '16 at 6:11
• @Danny: Assuming that you mean the set $$\left\{-1,-\frac12,-\frac13,\ldots,0,\ldots,\frac13,\frac12,1\right\}\;,$$ you’re set is bounded — it’s a subset of $[-1,1]$ — and closed — its only limit point is $0$, which is in the set — so it’s compact. Mar 12 '16 at 6:13