12
$\begingroup$

There is a question on this site about the distinctions between the full-twisted Mobius band and the cylinder, but I would like to ask something different, so I start a new question.

Let us call $C$ the standard cylinder embedded in $\mathbb{R}^3$, and call $F$ the full-twisted Mobius band (aka. the Mobius band with two "half-twists", or the Mobius band with a 360 degree twist), also embedded in $\mathbb{R}^3$. $C$ and $F$ are topologically homeomorphic to each other, but they are not isotopic within $\mathbb{R}^3$. Now think of $\mathbb{R}^3$ as a subspace of some higher dimensional Euclidean space $\mathbb{R}^n$ where $n\geq 3$, and ask if $C$ and $F$ are isotopic in $\mathbb{R}^n$. Obviously if $n \geq 6$ then $C$ and $F$ are isotopic. But what about $n = 4$ or $5$? Is there any chance that they are still isotopic, or can one prove that $n=6$ is the smallest number of dimensions in which $C$ and $F$ are isotopic? Any help or idea is appreciated. Thanks!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I can prove they're isotopic in $\Bbb R^5$. I don't know about $\Bbb R^4$ yet. $\endgroup$ – user98602 Mar 12 '16 at 5:12
  • $\begingroup$ One can show that the $\pm 1$-twisted bands are isotopic. I feel like these should both be isotopic to the $0$-twisted one since I've never heard of a well-defined $\mathbb Z_2$ framing number for curves in $4$-space, but I'm not seeing the right moves right now. $\endgroup$ – Cheerful Parsnip Mar 12 '16 at 5:23
  • $\begingroup$ @GrumpyParsnip: Well, what's worse, I have no earthly idea how I would prove they're not isotopic. $\endgroup$ – user98602 Mar 12 '16 at 5:46
  • $\begingroup$ @MikeMiller: I believe I found a way to trivialize any band. What do you think? $\endgroup$ – Cheerful Parsnip Mar 12 '16 at 15:52
6
$\begingroup$

I think they are isotopic in $\mathbb R^4$. Consider a circle embedded smoothly in $\mathbb R^4$. It has a normal bundle with fiber $D^3$ and boundary $S^2\times S^1$. Given a band, such as the twisted or untwisted ones in the question, you can think of one boundary component of the band as an embedded circle in $\mathbb R^4$, while the other boundary component lies in the boundary of the normal bundle. This gives a loop in $\pi_1(S^2)$. Such a loop can be homotoped to a point, since $S^2$ is simply connected, and this homotopy will give a fiber-preserving isotopy untwisting any band.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ We can null-homotope one of the boundary components, but can we do both at once? Because they're two-sided bands, perhaps we should think of the loops as loops in $\pi_1(\Bbb{RP}^2)$... EDIT: Ah, but we're twisting an even number of times, so these two-sided bands represent the trivial element. So they're trivializable. I agree! $\endgroup$ – user98602 Mar 12 '16 at 16:04
  • $\begingroup$ Oh, now I understand your argument, no need to talk about $\Bbb{RP}^2$ whatsoever. I doubly agree. $\endgroup$ – user98602 Mar 12 '16 at 16:22
  • $\begingroup$ @MikeMiller: thanks. $\endgroup$ – Cheerful Parsnip Mar 12 '16 at 16:40
  • $\begingroup$ @Grumpy Parsnip: Thanks for your great answer! I think that I can get the main idea. But when saying "this gives a loop in $\pi_1(S^2)$", is it implied that we somehow identify all the fibers of the bundle? $\endgroup$ – Kaius Mar 13 '16 at 4:41
  • $\begingroup$ Well Okay the bundle itself is the direct product $D^3\times S^1$, so it is a trivial matter to identify all the fibers. $\endgroup$ – Kaius Mar 13 '16 at 4:45

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.