2
$\begingroup$

In the proof of the existence of strong solutions of the stationary NSE in the setting of Hilbert spaces, the following argument is made in Constantin and Foias's Navier-Stokes Equations (p60):

Let $\Omega$ be an open bounded subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$, $n=2$ or $3$. Define $ V=\overline{\mathcal{V}}^{H_0^1(\Omega)^n} $ and $ H=\overline{\mathcal{V}}^{L^2(\Omega)^n} $ where $$ \mathcal{V}=\{f\in C_0^\infty(\Omega)^n\mid \textrm{div }f=0\}. $$ Let $u_m$ be a bounded sequence in $V$. Then there exists a subsequence $u_{m'}$ which is weakly convergent in $V$ to some $u\in V$. Passing to a subsequence if necessary, we may assume that $u_{m'}\to u$ in $H$ strongly.

Here is my question:

Why can weak convergence in $V$ imply strong convergence of a subsequence in $H$?

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Isn't $V$ compactly embedded into $H$? $\endgroup$ – Pedro Feb 28 '16 at 2:50
1
$\begingroup$

It is not that "weak convergence in $V$ implies strong convergence in $H$", but that a compact operator maps bounded sets to relatively compact sets.

Once one knows that $V$ is compactly embedded in $H$ (by the Rellich–Kondrachov theorem), $u_{m'}$ has a strongly convergent subsequence in $H$ since it is bounded in $V$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.